Re: [MBONED] WGLC for draft-ietf-mboned-dc-deploy and draft-ietf-mboned-deprecate-interdomain-asm

[Leonard Giuliano <[e-mail]>]

<chair hat off, speaking as individual contributor>

I support publication of draft-ietf-mboned-dc-deploy as this document 
describes a number of pertinent issues for mcast in a DC environment.

Some mostly editorial comments below:

Abstract: "judiciously" misspelled

Sect 1. Intro, 2nd para: I am confused by the tense used in this para- is 
it talking about the current situation, or in the future or even the past?  
If the future, how can an assumption of the future be known to be 
incorrect in the present?  Don't we need to arrive at that future point to 
determine how correct this assumption is?  Anyway, suggest sticking to the 
current state of affairs.

Sect 2.1, 2nd para: "... there is a consensus..."
	-would "expectation" be more appropriate than "consensus"

Sect 2.2, 1st para: "... overlays mainly simply ..."
	-probably just "simply" would be simpler

Sect 3: "...arguably the intuitive initial course of action for a data 
center operator..."
	-perhaps better to say: "it makes sense for a data center 
operator..."

Sect 3.3, 1st para, last sentence: "Thus, PIM must be running..."
	-"Thus, a multicast routing protocol (typically PIM) must be 
running..."

Sect 4.1: I thought this section was very informative and well-written

Sect 4.4, 3rd para:  "The
   deployment envisioned with overlay networks is that the the
   encapsulation endpoints would be the BFIR."
	-suggest something like the following: "The BFIRs are the 
encapsulation endpoints in the deployment envisioned with overlay 
networks."




On Fri, 19 Jul 2019, Leonard Giuliano wrote:

| 
| We would like to officially begin working group last call for BOTH
| draft-ietf-mboned-dc-deploy and draft-ietf-mboned-deprecate-interdomain-asm.
| Please post whether you support/oppose the advancement of either/both of the
| drafts as well as any comments you may have to the list by Aug 16.  Also,
| please note if you are aware of any IPR involved in this drafts (we must hear
| from the authors about IPR).
| 
| Most recent version of the draft can be found here:
| https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mboned-dc-deploy/
| https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mboned-deprecate-interdomain-asm/
|