Re: [MBONED] "MLDv2 Procedures for Link-Layer Unicast Delivery of Multicast"
Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com> Fri, 29 March 2013 21:34 UTC
Return-Path: <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mboned@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mboned@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 628A521F95F6; Fri, 29 Mar 2013 14:34:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.499, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0semF0Yx+cmA; Fri, 29 Mar 2013 14:34:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lb0-f177.google.com (mail-lb0-f177.google.com [209.85.217.177]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFE9821F95F4; Fri, 29 Mar 2013 14:33:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lb0-f177.google.com with SMTP id r10so572162lbi.8 for <multiple recipients>; Fri, 29 Mar 2013 14:33:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=+gNYr7e2DaN47v/9AlVyqE20pkjvGg2pCtY1GvSrGJI=; b=irrmzHfHsJ8G6kdQVcAzYFV5CjGb2Fjv3zaz6i+f41GKT5a2ZxuWIpOxKf25Hh/nK3 sff/KWG6EP/1+7XKitG6myOGu/dvCGYLy9MwAUNilH6M4Ah7QPykFho1Tncwz+mnnO+w bvsZfLlxFFCgXy7Uw2ccn73/0mPcHRVWBAvNZZdh+FA8L6ZrAQqd/xSy9q4UUVCop02Y tCS6ppRc/hK9VLJsowM6nQ9OporzneWfPCymyYvgiDrlrnWMr49Xh35g+nbWCeNciFJT cb1NfHxW7mdRo9yAryzXxRFJDWWV7eKNDkCXOE58Jy0z/993FvejPJQ3tf9w8Tz3kwd0 pLfA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.123.194 with SMTP id mc2mr1812760lab.7.1364592838811; Fri, 29 Mar 2013 14:33:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.114.93.41 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Mar 2013 14:33:58 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <44E744236D325141AE8DDC88A45908AD0C9BBE@TK5EX14MBXC264.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
References: <20130329024509.29249.3948.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <1364527313.7097.YahooMailNeo@web142504.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <44E744236D325141AE8DDC88A45908AD0C9BBE@TK5EX14MBXC264.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 16:33:58 -0500
Message-ID: <CAC8QAcehc4VzU3zDEJrH-FkDDPWPpH6+1pwEHh_VLd1693PvuA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
To: Dave Thaler <dthaler@microsoft.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f46d04426eda6ba7f604d917079f"
Cc: "mboned@ietf.org" <mboned@ietf.org>, Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@yahoo.com.au>, "6man@ietf.org" <6man@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MBONED] "MLDv2 Procedures for Link-Layer Unicast Delivery of Multicast"
X-BeenThere: mboned@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: sarikaya@ieee.org
List-Id: Mail List for the Mboned Working Group <mboned.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mboned>, <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mboned>
List-Post: <mailto:mboned@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned>, <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 21:34:08 -0000
Hi Mark, I read your draft. First of all I think you misunderstood RFC 6085 and based on a wrong assumption you developed your solution. I suggest you take a look at http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sarikaya-netext-pmipv6-shared-link-01 on Netext for PMIPv6. I believe that we should use multicast delivery as much as possible on the downlink if the link is a shared link. Regards, Behcet On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Dave Thaler <dthaler@microsoft.com> wrote: > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-thaler-ngtrans-6to4-multicast > is work we did back in 2000 on this same topic. At the time, the draft > is written from > the perspective of the 6to4 NBMA link, but the topic was discussed > (specifically by those > in the acknowledgements section, and to a lesser extent by the ngtrans WG > as a whole) > as being more generally applicable. > > There wasn't significant interest at the time and so the work was dropped > rather than updating the spec to use generic language. > > The same concept as in the above was however then used in 2001 in > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mboned-auto-multicast > (still specific to a particular link type though), which after 11 years is > now in the IESG :) > > The most relevant WG is MBoneD. > > -Dave > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > > Mark Smith > > Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 8:22 PM > > To: 6man@ietf.org > > Subject: "MLDv2 Procedures for Link-Layer Unicast Delivery of Multicast" > > > > Hi, > > > > The following is inspired by some work I did in around 2010/2011 on a > > multicast TV service, where residential customers with Wifi networks > > suffered from performance problems, and had to be advised to buy > > ethernet over power devices if they couldn't run wired ethernet to the > STB > > attached to their TV. > > > > I've done some experiments on my home wifi network, using VLC, and > > switching between multicast and unicast IPv6 to test the concept. The > wifi > > performance issues disappear when the video is delivered via unicast UDP. > > (If people want to play with VLC and IPv6 multicast, email me off-list, > as there > > are a few issues e.g. the GUI doesn't accept some of the IPv6 multicast > > parameters that the command line does). > > > > I think there is a possibility the technique could also be applied to > > IGMPv3/ARP, although it depends on whether ARP has been implemented > > in a similar manner to IPv6 ND (e.g. an ARP equivalent to NUD). My > > understanding is that Linux has implemented ARP this way. I'll do some > more > > research to verify this. > > > > I though I'd post it to see if there is merit in the idea and it is > worth spending > > more of my time on. I looked for a IETF group more suitable to this, but > didn't > > seem to be able to find one. If there is one, please let me know. > > > > Review and comments most appreciated. > > > > Thanks very much, > > Mark. > > > > > > ----- Forwarded Message ----- > > > From: "internet-drafts@ietf.org" <internet-drafts@ietf.org> > > > To: markzzzsmith@yahoo.com.au > > > Cc: > > > Sent: Friday, 29 March 2013 1:45 PM > > > Subject: New Version Notification for > > > draft-smith-mldv2-link-unicast-00.txt > > > > > > > > > A new version of I-D, draft-smith-mldv2-link-unicast-00.txt > > > has been successfully submitted by Mark Smith and posted to the IETF > > > repository. > > > > > > Filename: draft-smith-mldv2-link-unicast > > > Revision: 00 > > > Title: MLDv2 Procedures for Link-Layer Unicast Delivery of > > > Multicast > > > IPv6 > > > Creation date: 2013-03-29 > > > Group: Individual Submission > > > Number of pages: 7 > > > URL: > > > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-smith-mldv2-link-unicast-00. > > > txt > > > Status: > > > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-smith-mldv2-link-unicast > > > Htmlized: > > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-smith-mldv2-link-unicast-00 > > > > > > > > > Abstract: > > > Some multi-access link-layer technologies typically not provide > > > good > > > IPv6 multicast performance, using link-layer multicasts, when the > > > volume of multicast traffic is significant. It would be possible > > > to > > > replicate and then link-layer unicast multicast IPv6 traffic to > > > interested listeners to overcome these link-layer performance > > > limitations. This memo describes MLDv2 and IPv6 neighbor discovery > > > procedures to support link-layer unicast delivery of multicast IPv6 > > > traffic. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The IETF Secretariat > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > > ipv6@ietf.org > > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > _______________________________________________ > MBONED mailing list > MBONED@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned >
- Re: [MBONED] "MLDv2 Procedures for Link-Layer Uni… Dave Thaler
- Re: [MBONED] "MLDv2 Procedures for Link-Layer Uni… Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [MBONED] "MLDv2 Procedures for Link-Layer Uni… Mark Smith
- Re: [MBONED] "MLDv2 Procedures for Link-Layer Uni… Mark Smith
- Re: [MBONED] "MLDv2 Procedures for Link-Layer Uni… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [MBONED] "MLDv2 Procedures for Link-Layer Uni… Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [MBONED] "MLDv2 Procedures for Link-Layer Uni… Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [MBONED] "MLDv2 Procedures for Link-Layer Uni… Manfredi, Albert E
- Re: [MBONED] "MLDv2 Procedures for Link-Layer Uni… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [MBONED] "MLDv2 Procedures for Link-Layer Uni… Mark Smith
- Re: [MBONED] "MLDv2 Procedures for Link-Layer Uni… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [MBONED] "MLDv2 Procedures for Link-Layer Uni… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [MBONED] "MLDv2 Procedures for Link-Layer Uni… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [MBONED] "MLDv2 Procedures for Link-Layer Uni… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [MBONED] "MLDv2 Procedures for Link-Layer Uni… Christian Huitema
- Re: [MBONED] "MLDv2 Procedures for Link-Layer Uni… Christian Huitema
- Re: [MBONED] "MLDv2 Procedures for Link-Layer Uni… Andrew McGregor
- Re: [MBONED] "MLDv2 Procedures for Link-Layer Uni… Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [MBONED] "MLDv2 Procedures for Link-Layer Uni… Mark Smith