Re: [MBONED] Multicast in ARMD
Leonard Giuliano <lenny@juniper.net> Tue, 20 March 2012 15:41 UTC
Return-Path: <lenny@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: mboned@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mboned@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDF0621F85E1 for <mboned@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 08:41:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 66uN7y3nW11z for <mboned@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 08:41:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og123.obsmtp.com (exprod7og123.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.24]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C16AC21F85C4 for <mboned@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 08:41:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from P-EMHUB01-HQ.jnpr.net ([66.129.224.36]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob123.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKT2ilPQCmBajHx6AMusK0pwArN5FGwJwY@postini.com; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 08:41:51 PDT
Received: from magenta.juniper.net (172.17.27.123) by P-EMHUB01-HQ.jnpr.net (172.24.192.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.213.0; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 08:41:27 -0700
Received: from eng-mail01.juniper.net (eng-mail01.juniper.net [172.17.28.114]) by magenta.juniper.net (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id q2KFfR198833; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 08:41:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from lenny@juniper.net)
Received: by eng-mail01.juniper.net (Postfix, from userid 1709) id 05D6511454; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 08:41:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eng-mail01.juniper.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE8671144F; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 08:41:26 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 08:41:26 -0700
From: Leonard Giuliano <lenny@juniper.net>
To: Mike McBride <mmcbride7@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL3FGfwbAxGTeCK2YqFdjH=BaHBpPNqf3vv5N17bTO7LaKHjMQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20120320083748.E42463@eng-mail01.juniper.net>
References: <CAL3FGfwbAxGTeCK2YqFdjH=BaHBpPNqf3vv5N17bTO7LaKHjMQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Cc: MBONED WG <mboned@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MBONED] Multicast in ARMD
X-BeenThere: mboned@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mail List for the Mboned Working Group <mboned.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mboned>, <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mboned>
List-Post: <mailto:mboned@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned>, <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 15:41:53 -0000
Mike- I don't really see anything in the charter that would necessarily preclude mcast in the data center being a topic of exploration in MBONED. -Lenny On Mon, 19 Mar 2012, Mike McBride wrote: -) For those of you who follow ARMD you know there was a flurry of mails, -) a month or two ago, about multicast in the data center. Some said IP -) Multicast is crap and is not used in the data center. Others said IP -) Multicast was critical for them in the data center. We captured the -) discussion in draft-mcbride-armd-mcast-overview-01 and tried to add -) unbiased analysis. -) -) It was decided that ARMD is not the place to document multicast in the -) DC. Perhaps this is an area we want to document in mboned (or -) elsewhere like DCops). Do we want to consider adding multicast -) operation in the data center to the mboned charter? -) -) thanks, -) mike -) -) http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-mcbride-armd-mcast-overview-01.txt -) _______________________________________________ -) MBONED mailing list -) MBONED@ietf.org -) https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned -)
- [MBONED] Multicast in ARMD Mike McBride
- Re: [MBONED] Multicast in ARMD Leonard Giuliano