[MBONED] Multicast in ARMD
Mike McBride <mmcbride7@gmail.com> Mon, 19 March 2012 21:49 UTC
Return-Path: <mmcbride7@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mboned@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mboned@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C28121F8628 for <mboned@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Mar 2012 14:49:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.515
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.515 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.084, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3s5Nt5OE4DOp for <mboned@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Mar 2012 14:49:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lb0-f172.google.com (mail-lb0-f172.google.com [209.85.217.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C802F21F8623 for <mboned@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Mar 2012 14:49:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by lbol12 with SMTP id l12so4250032lbo.31 for <mboned@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Mar 2012 14:49:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=kBRjB+mzE/g+g6kZphj5DaTD1yK7uF+Q41xvqzuQa/8=; b=oHj+/l3RetfTYZFCZPGAzsVwdB0jtCgsOInRXjhkY0Ck5yNCD13H8ldrWBZ/mwnkYg 7HGinOFKrG08+u+V3PqFV1UikHszkwZUJRLYZHzlw2KpP7iGNytwU/XGNc03/vN1elHH edhJ0ZhcQ4qRML0uOrRPPJ9SrnPV/k/JlxapSNxj/q0JZntcE0MmRRka/LpPHS8PLsF9 JhftNptVopr8v3WIxjzEdglftScvo03uXwsKrENl2ukPB6HSMAO01JvkdaKjSxqc0M7n QpLn7saT1/p4cxxwhvPf1QcNgBzb6VHz5CfycaJoeEAw8hkoikNWmPMibr0Uuie+roE1 IJOA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.112.85.33 with SMTP id e1mr5445757lbz.45.1332193754768; Mon, 19 Mar 2012 14:49:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.152.127.7 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Mar 2012 14:49:14 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 14:49:14 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL3FGfwbAxGTeCK2YqFdjH=BaHBpPNqf3vv5N17bTO7LaKHjMQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mike McBride <mmcbride7@gmail.com>
To: MBONED WG <mboned@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Subject: [MBONED] Multicast in ARMD
X-BeenThere: mboned@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mail List for the Mboned Working Group <mboned.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mboned>, <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mboned>
List-Post: <mailto:mboned@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned>, <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 21:49:20 -0000
For those of you who follow ARMD you know there was a flurry of mails, a month or two ago, about multicast in the data center. Some said IP Multicast is crap and is not used in the data center. Others said IP Multicast was critical for them in the data center. We captured the discussion in draft-mcbride-armd-mcast-overview-01 and tried to add unbiased analysis. It was decided that ARMD is not the place to document multicast in the DC. Perhaps this is an area we want to document in mboned (or elsewhere like DCops). Do we want to consider adding multicast operation in the data center to the mboned charter? thanks, mike http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-mcbride-armd-mcast-overview-01.txt
- [MBONED] Multicast in ARMD Mike McBride
- Re: [MBONED] Multicast in ARMD Leonard Giuliano