Re: [MBONED] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-mboned-deprecate-interdomain-asm-06: (with COMMENT)

Tim Chown <Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk> Tue, 07 January 2020 13:09 UTC

Return-Path: <tim.chown@jisc.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: mboned@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mboned@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A21091200F9 for <mboned@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Jan 2020 05:09:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=jisc.ac.uk
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gXHgt0dVI_vj for <mboned@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Jan 2020 05:09:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from eu-smtp-delivery-189.mimecast.com (eu-smtp-delivery-189.mimecast.com [207.82.80.189]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0BE81200F1 for <mboned@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Jan 2020 05:09:16 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jisc.ac.uk; s=mimecast20170213; t=1578402555; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=AOuS5z9McNNCTePZMDJfBd98zvVTSJjxTMBPnjWYBSA=; b=J4a3hqpf+LFmtKhwpXPchdonciZmw9PkkMkG0QG1iljbnRjmRIgz88/VP27Ih3L4uuYV54 +tFpsM8EZSRy2l1z0C38f1YK2jqp/6WL4EEG9FYnHH/x2GwKAlTUlrcY9hg8y6L788rPHG 5XMExMa4oOn642aQTeEmp4KaRaY7yYk=
Received: from EUR04-DB3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-db3eur04lp2052.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.12.52]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id uk-mta-138-9vkzXI7pPoWMw07Y1fXnNA-1; Tue, 07 Jan 2020 13:09:13 +0000
Received: from AM5PR0701MB2849.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.168.153.149) by AM5PR0701MB2627.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.173.93.16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2623.6; Tue, 7 Jan 2020 13:09:08 +0000
Received: from AM5PR0701MB2849.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::387c:d4f9:aa28:5081]) by AM5PR0701MB2849.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::387c:d4f9:aa28:5081%9]) with mapi id 15.20.2623.008; Tue, 7 Jan 2020 13:09:08 +0000
From: Tim Chown <Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk>
To: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
CC: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "mboned@ietf.org" <mboned@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-mboned-deprecate-interdomain-asm@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mboned-deprecate-interdomain-asm@ietf.org>, "mboned-chairs@ietf.org" <mboned-chairs@ietf.org>, "cdoyle@juniper.net" <cdoyle@juniper.net>
Thread-Topic: [MBONED] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-mboned-deprecate-interdomain-asm-06: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHVxLrYqXVWmHltnEil5G6FbSvMwqffLh+A
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2020 13:09:08 +0000
Message-ID: <9027999D-AAAC-4248-9D7C-A477E18F3210@jisc.ac.uk>
References: <157833346370.7979.9076338055057075360.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <157833346370.7979.9076338055057075360.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.40.2.2.4)
x-originating-ip: [2001:a88:d510:1101:5543:6681:fa7b:886c]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 719354ef-0997-4a92-d3df-08d79372c7ff
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: AM5PR0701MB2627:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <AM5PR0701MB2627E456185CFAE8C71D2CA4D63F0@AM5PR0701MB2627.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508;
x-forefront-prvs: 027578BB13
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(376002)(366004)(346002)(396003)(39850400004)(136003)(199004)(189003)(2906002)(478600001)(81156014)(8676002)(81166006)(6916009)(4326008)(71200400001)(8936002)(36756003)(786003)(6486002)(966005)(316002)(64756008)(2616005)(91956017)(5660300002)(33656002)(66476007)(66556008)(6512007)(86362001)(76116006)(66946007)(6506007)(53546011)(21615005)(66446008)(54906003)(186003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:AM5PR0701MB2627; H:AM5PR0701MB2849.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: jisc.ac.uk
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 719354ef-0997-4a92-d3df-08d79372c7ff
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 07 Jan 2020 13:09:08.6181 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 48f9394d-8a14-4d27-82a6-f35f12361205
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: 4GZ18nZaN4i4ptdUU7tPuxk66UPin/t6ApcQNFicLs6R2NXUJcdA/6Ih0q9ZqpNXQG8GZQFShtVN5AyWaSt45w==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AM5PR0701MB2627
X-MC-Unique: 9vkzXI7pPoWMw07Y1fXnNA-1
X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_9027999DAAAC42489D7CA477E18F3210jiscacuk_"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mboned/eyHi5HFbCtvYL0GUG67iEguqXKo>
Subject: Re: [MBONED] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-mboned-deprecate-interdomain-asm-06: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: mboned@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mail List for the Mboned Working Group <mboned.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mboned>, <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mboned/>
List-Post: <mailto:mboned@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned>, <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2020 13:09:20 -0000

Thanks Alissa, we’ll make those changes in the next rev.

Best wishes,
Tim






On 6 Jan 2020, at 17:57, Alissa Cooper via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org<mailto:noreply@ietf.org>> wrote:

Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-mboned-deprecate-interdomain-asm-06: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mboned-deprecate-interdomain-asm/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

A couple of suggestions to help the document be more timeless:

= Section 2.2.1 =

s/To this day/At the time of this writing/

= Section 4.4 =

OLD
While the WG discussions had consensus that best practices should be
  developed to explain when to use SSM in applications, e.g, when ASM
  without (S,G) state in the network is better, or when dedicated
  service-discovery mechanisms should be used, it was agreed that
  documenting such practices are outside the scope of this document.

NEW
This document describes best practices to explain when to use SSM in
applications, e.g, when ASM without (S,G) state in the network is better, or
when dedicated service-discovery mechanisms should be used, but specifying
these practices is outside the scope of this document.


_______________________________________________
MBONED mailing list
MBONED@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned