IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MBONED] WGLC: Re: Questions re: draft-ietf-mboned-driad-amt-discovery

Kyle Rose <krose@krose.org> Mon, 28 October 2019 16:52 UTC

Return-Path: <krose@krose.org>
X-Original-To: mboned@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mboned@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25A60120119 for <mboned@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 09:52:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=krose.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G5wJHcYrL1QH for <mboned@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 09:52:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yb1-xb35.google.com (mail-yb1-xb35.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A63E51200F5 for <mboned@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 09:52:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yb1-xb35.google.com with SMTP id q143so4271508ybg.12 for <mboned@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 09:52:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=krose.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=JyEN9tnLUzI6l6IsKGZFU121geZ1CJiJEzrihUmab4U=; b=jstadLBMgYgtpE87XBLU0yActZn3zocTd15w4h24qQYw0dqB737Mi1QeqRSH1xVrws NkcTIfmetlHuGRYHgh6ucVkWbEJitbZArvZWlkOd+uS6Chny7rZNVK7ygn1ritjd1y1Z VaTtpeixllNTi5HWaGY7wG2O7jT7Y5Yy8757g=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=JyEN9tnLUzI6l6IsKGZFU121geZ1CJiJEzrihUmab4U=; b=b1lINUUQKD9e7nJnF0oMF8EmJOciLQ9syCCukUF6C0tkuaqrHy03iG5NNQDGjAqVbM 9vRAR21oQ2l+dyt0cVF08m+Nu8kZnTvKbIfJmKVVf1l9uMqA0DCgydVRiY+6CfTzwhRr aaLWjku+gLiDoi37GCkw/PuS0/iS5iPeu0QuV85PY9phZGpN8Whnc20b4ukZfDDqs1GE QUe7iFDmvLRnYK9jIt7p0ZXbV18DRJK0nJOqWdybcnA3jJUfjQLylhtV7xEd/7zda8mV 6qshSfGIIsuolrzzOfCBJvpWb3FAUZheyE2ci5AlERgjbWpyhnd4ueaejKQytOEQB5Q0 8uwQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWuj6b+PdyRXv27G4E1Gt8VbpJMUBt3P6CGS7pNdTKsV9+uT/6P Wz4X6LhJf613f+yT7Yo68aeP6WxCYVEnmGsN6sc89w==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw2bleh/g0syxIujkgFbeebyNMi4R6aRjl9UrnYEoPonZpuMDTHUlW85BvPQTdiMjeJb+7GDXTnwd5XVsNT7us=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:bd8c:: with SMTP id f12mr14547750ybh.379.1572281573430; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 09:52:53 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAHw9_iJ5MYoCUY-hRysEfpnYfkmogbfAfhGaqvEDpCn4h9f=OQ@mail.gmail.com> <65D61935-47C9-42D1-AE9C-D4FB5B2A0B31@akamai.com> <CAHw9_iKD9U7cEzTwmTok-8Dp96i6wpW4R+4P+6oMQkGB_j8+_g@mail.gmail.com> <CAHw9_iLWS2O3JqwTJGFpcxzq-UVfN-LURU9Fg5r2j615+XBmvQ@mail.gmail.com> <D118AC40-331E-4C42-83E6-719DB8350B15@akamai.com> <CAHw9_i+Yv9WP43QkYkwT_BQ+1-QAwNyckcfsUwayhxqP0+qogw@mail.gmail.com> <E87175EA-4D90-4866-9A26-477D3FEBF4F9@akamai.com> <CABFReBoyL5+_t1oMZxsUsRB7Q5LxE3G++HTiOi2H7J79C6oAaA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABFReBoyL5+_t1oMZxsUsRB7Q5LxE3G++HTiOi2H7J79C6oAaA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Kyle Rose <krose@krose.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2019 12:52:40 -0400
Message-ID: <CAJU8_nXpvpTMd78qUdrPyAEOqa-pOLW=wEBtY44KSdm73OHvNw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Holland, Jake" <jholland@akamai.com>
Cc: MBONED WG <mboned@ietf.org>, "Shepherd, Greg -- Greg Shepherd" <gjshep@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000abe9ff0595fb54c8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mboned/o9lT63pck_mYs5_SsTH8BPfdL7g>
Subject: Re: [MBONED] WGLC: Re: Questions re: draft-ietf-mboned-driad-amt-discovery
X-BeenThere: mboned@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mail List for the Mboned Working Group <mboned.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mboned>, <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mboned/>
List-Post: <mailto:mboned@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned>, <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2019 16:52:56 -0000

On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 12:03 PM Greg Shepherd <gjshep@gmail.com> wrote:

> The open comments were addressed.
>
> 1 Week WGLC. Please respond again, with/without support by Nov 4.
>

Re: "connection", RFC 7450 uses "connection" in a relevant way in exactly
one place (4.1.4 Deployment) but (as noted in this draft) fails to define
it. It does repeatedly refer to a three-way handshake, however, so perhaps
text should be added to this draft to make it clear that "connection" is
(AFAICT) being defined as completion of the first two steps of the
three-way handshake from 7450.

Re: the DNS rate limiting, what motivated the numbers in the normative:

q( Otherwise, a gateway MUST provide a rate limit for the DNS queries, and
its default settings MUST NOT permit more than 10 queries for any
100-millisecond period)

Happy to know if I just missed a discussion thread someplace.

OW, looks good. Ship it.

Kyle

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email