Re: [MEDIACTRL] ISSUE 1 - IVR Package

I think mandating HTTP/HTTPS is definitely ok: my guess is everyone will support AT LEAST those two, so it's safe to add this.

L.

On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 14:59:39 +0000
"McGlashan, Scott" <scott.mcglashan@hp.com> wrote:

> Hi All,
> 
> As part of our IESG review of the IVR package the following issue has been identified:
> 
> 1) In Section 4:
> 
>    The MS MUST
>    support one or more schemes using communication protocols suitable
>    for fetching resources (e.g.  HTTP).
> 
> I don't think this is good enough for interoperability. You should specify a
> mandatory to implement protocol for fetching resources.
> I suggest you mandate
> use of HTTP and HTTPS. (The latter is important for providing data
> confidentiality)
> 
> The same issue is relevant in section 4.3.1.4 - a mandatory to implement
> protocol for recording data.
> 
> Are we happy to mandate the use of HTTP and HTTPS in the context of fetching dialog documents and resources as well as recordings?
> This seems a reasonable change to us but would affect implementations which don't already support these protocols. Let us know if you have any objections to this change.
> 
> thanks
> 
> Scott
> _______________________________________________
> MEDIACTRL mailing list
> MEDIACTRL@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mediactrl
> Supplemental Web Site:
> http://www.standardstrack.com/ietf/mediactrl
> 

-- 
Lorenzo Miniero <lorenzo@meetecho.com>

Re: [MEDIACTRL] ISSUE 1 - IVR Package - HTTP/HTTPS mandatory