[Megaco] RE: Comment / question about H.248 NAS package

"Tom-PT Taylor" <taylor@nortelnetworks.com> Thu, 06 December 2001 04:48 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id XAA00871 for <megaco-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Dec 2001 23:48:53 -0500 (EST)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id XAA21472; Wed, 5 Dec 2001 23:13:24 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id XAA21433 for <megaco@optimus.ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Dec 2001 23:13:21 -0500 (EST)
Received: from zcars0m9.nortelnetworks.com (zcars0m9.nortelnetworks.com [47.129.242.157]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id XAA29983 for <megaco@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Dec 2001 23:13:16 -0500 (EST)
Received: from zcars04f.ca.nortel.com (zcars04f.ca.nortel.com [47.129.242.57]) by zcars0m9.nortelnetworks.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id fB648od20117 for <megaco@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Dec 2001 23:08:50 -0500 (EST)
Received: from zcard015.ca.nortel.com by zcars04f.ca.nortel.com; Wed, 5 Dec 2001 23:09:18 -0500
Received: by zcard015.ca.nortel.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <X6VF2GPN>; Wed, 5 Dec 2001 23:08:06 -0500
Message-ID: <4D79C746863DD51197690002A52CDA00274BDB@zcard0kc.ca.nortel.com>
From: Tom-PT Taylor <taylor@nortelnetworks.com>
To: 'Hannu Vormisto' <hannu.vormisto@lmf.ericsson.se>
Cc: Christian Groves <Christian.Groves@ericsson.com.au>, "Thomas Haegh (EUD)" <QUDTHH@am1.ericsson.se>, Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@lmf.ericsson.se>, Ron Stoughton <rms@acc.am.ericsson.se>, megaco@ietf.org
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2001 23:08:07 -0500
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
X-Orig: <taylor@americasm01.nt.com>
Subject: [Megaco] RE: Comment / question about H.248 NAS package
Sender: megaco-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: megaco-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: Media Gateway Control <megaco.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: megaco@ietf.org

There are other points I will have to consider at more length in your note,
but my answer to the TMR/USI question was
draft-taylor-mmusic-sdp-tdm-00.txt.  This gave the text encoding for Local
and Remote to specify these values.  Annex C does indeed cover the binary.

Unfortunately  my draft was held up by people who wanted material related to
CAS-controlled TDM rolled in.  I'm not sure what that material would be -- a
bearer is a bearer regardless of the signalling method.  Anyway, I have yet
to hear from them on what they want in there.  I will reissue my draft after
next week's meeting with a few touch-ups.

-----Original Message-----
From: Hannu Vormisto [mailto:hannu.vormisto@lmf.ericsson.se]
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 10:19 AM
To: Tom-PT Taylor
Cc: Christian Groves; Thomas Haegh (EUD); Christer Holmberg; Ron
Stoughton; megaco@ietf.org
Subject: Comment / question about H.248 NAS package


Hi Tom,

I am sending this comment/question to you like Christian is proposing.

Christian Groves wrote:
> 
> G'Day Hannu,
> 
> In the scenario you talk about you could use H.248v2 to individually
> auditvalue the TMR and USI when you receive the event. Alternatively you
> could put the proposal to the NAS authors to add TMR/USI to the event.
> 
> Regards, Christian


I have a question / coment concernig "draft-ietf-megaco-naspkg-03.txt"
I have not yet found a way for the MG to define, on call by call basis
which type or of PSTN bearer - Transmission Media Requirements (TMR)
the MGC shoulkd use for the outgoing call - neither any means for the
MG to indicate which type of User Service Indicator (USI) should
be used for the outgoing call. I also have some questions - request
for clarification concerning the TMR and USI usage with NAS incoming
calls.

I have been told that for Incoming NAS Calls, the general support in
H.248 Annex C defines how TMR and USI can be passed from MGC to MG
(NAS context) when creating the context for incoming NAS call.
Would it be possible to explicitly mention/clarify in H.248 NAS package
definition that TMR and USI properties from H.248 Annex C can be used
in addition to those NAS specific properties that have been defined
in NAS INCOMING PACKAGE when creating the context for NAS calls?

For NAS outgoing calls, I would like the H.248 NAS package to define
and explain how MG can push up to MGC its own idea of suitable TMR and
USI values for a PSTN call that has been initiated with NAS CONTROL PACKAGE
"Outgoing Call" event. Christian is proposing above that TMR and USI
could be Audited from MG, but at least I have not seen any procedures
on NAS package explaining how MGC could audit TMR and USI from "NAS Control 
termination" (using "data user handle" as a key ???) before the MGC
initiates the call. I think mysef that it would be easier to include
TMR and USI (or sufficient input for those) directly as optional
parameters to NAS CONTROL PACKAGE "Outgoing Call" event.

The text below is my own, from my question to Christian and I hope
it explains the background and the traffic cases for this question.

> > What I want to do, is the MG/NAS to initiate an outgoing PSTN call.
> > Either because of L2TP dialout or for "dial-on-demand" type of functions
> > that the MG/NAS can spontaniously invoke. Here I assume that
> > the MG/NAS knows how the call should be made and which TMR and USI
should
> > be used. That is, if the MG/NAS (or the AAA servers that the MGs are
using)
> > is clever enough to know which PSTN number to call, it is clever enough
to
> > know whether it should make a modem call, ISDN data call or e.g. ISDN
data
> > call using V.110 rate adaptation. For this purpose, the MG/NAS should be
> > able to indicate, before the PSTN call setup, which type of TMR and USI
the
> > MGC should use and also indicate with parameters in ISUP IAM message
> > for the outgoing call. Below is the logically correct and shortest
> > sequence for NAS dialout, but it is course not according to H.248 NAS
> > package since the package does not include TMR and USI on NAS control
> > package Outgoing Call event.
> >
> >      MG/NAS                         MGC                      ISUP
> >       |                              |                        |
> >   Any reason for MG to initiate      |                        |
> >   an outgoing NAS call!              |                        |
> >       |                              |                        |
> >       |   H.248 NAS Control Event:   |                        |
> >       |   Outgoing Call(             |                        |
> >       |       number to dial,        |                        |
> >       |       data user handle,      |                        |
> >       |       TMR                    |                        |
> >       |       USI)                   |                        |
> >       |----------------------------->| IAM(numbers,TMR, USI)  |
> >       |                              |----------------------> |
> >       |   Add (TDM+NAS,              |   CON                  |
> >       |        Data User Handle)     |<-----------------------|
> >       |                              |
> >       |<-----------------------------|
> >       |    Reply                     |
> >       |----------------------------->|
> >

Regards,
Hannu Vormisto

_______________________________________________
Megaco mailing list
Megaco@ietf.org
http://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/megaco