IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MEXT] [WGLC] draft-ietf-mext-flow-binding-03

"Yuri Ismailov" <yuri.ismailov@ericsson.com> Wed, 21 October 2009 08:12 UTC

Return-Path: <yuri.ismailov@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: mext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E4403A685B for <mext@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 01:12:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6Cmk6TwF6eYS for <mext@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 01:12:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw3.ericsson.se (mailgw3.ericsson.se [193.180.251.60]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFA133A67A1 for <mext@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 01:12:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb3c-b7b3fae00000105f-0b-4adec26d908b
Received: from esealmw129.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by mailgw3.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 52.EA.04191.D62CEDA4; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 10:12:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from esealmw106.eemea.ericsson.se ([153.88.200.69]) by esealmw129.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 21 Oct 2009 10:06:44 +0200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 10:06:42 +0200
Message-ID: <C24C03AE7348E44FB76B34B5D4ED44F503EDA7B1@esealmw106.eemea.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <346103.90889.qm@web111407.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [MEXT] [WGLC] draft-ietf-mext-flow-binding-03
Thread-Index: AcpRl5T31646WtRNThOHRe/GeaYKxwAjaMaw
References: <C703464A.FCC4%hesham@elevatemobile.com> <346103.90889.qm@web111407.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
From: Yuri Ismailov <yuri.ismailov@ericsson.com>
To: Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya@ieee.org>, Hesham Soliman <hesham@elevatemobile.com>, Conny Larsson <conny.larsson@ericsson.com>, "Laganier, Julien" <julienl@qualcomm.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Oct 2009 08:06:44.0949 (UTC) FILETIME=[6E319050:01CA5225]
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Cc: mext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [MEXT] [WGLC] draft-ietf-mext-flow-binding-03
X-BeenThere: mext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile IPv6 EXTensions WG <mext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mext>
List-Post: <mailto:mext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 08:12:29 -0000

Hi,
Sorry for jumping in, but did not understand the point with re-chartering.
As I can see it is in the charter.

/yuri
 

-----Original Message-----
From: mext-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mext-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Behcet Sarikaya
Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2009 5:11 PM
To: Hesham Soliman; Conny Larsson; Laganier, Julien
Cc: mext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [MEXT] [WGLC] draft-ietf-mext-flow-binding-03

Hi Conny, Hesham,



----- Original Message ----
> From: Hesham Soliman <hesham@elevatemobile.com>
> To: Conny Larsson <conny.larsson@ericsson.com>; "Laganier, Julien" 
> <julienl@qualcomm.com>
> Cc: "mext@ietf.org" <mext@ietf.org>
> Sent: Mon, October 19, 2009 6:49:46 PM
> Subject: Re: [MEXT] [WGLC] draft-ietf-mext-flow-binding-03
> 
> Hi Conny,
> 
> We need the comments now, not after the document is updated :). This 
> is WGLC and we're updating the document as a result of reviews.
> 
> The bidirectionality issue was discussed and it was decided that there 
> is no case for it.

I don't think this reflects the situation.

The right answer is that flow revocation and possibly other flow binding operations initiated by HA will be taken up as part of MEXT rechartering.

BTW we revised our draft, here is the link to the revised draft:

http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-xia-mext-ha-init-flow-binding-01.txt


Regards,

Behcet


      
_______________________________________________
MEXT mailing list
MEXT@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email