IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MEXT] [WGLC] draft-ietf-mext-flow-binding-03

Behcet Sarikaya <behcetsarikaya@yahoo.com> Tue, 20 October 2009 15:11 UTC

Return-Path: <behcetsarikaya@yahoo.com>
X-Original-To: mext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFB563A6844 for <mext@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Oct 2009 08:11:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.058
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.058 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.207, BAYES_00=-2.599, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QzoG7nGw1Kmn for <mext@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Oct 2009 08:11:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from web111407.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (web111407.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [67.195.15.168]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 276373A67BD for <mext@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Oct 2009 08:11:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 91747 invoked by uid 60001); 20 Oct 2009 15:11:13 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1256051473; bh=ABpB0E9DVrGOogXfJXGS1ZCod7rN2UQvkyRFykXa//Y=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=Eab70BmcaAhlb69nLcEVssCxKRLO7uD8c/VoO2GE96YKT7piSVcGhnBoAt9wTTJUsDA36a3Ln34Hvv4w3snWvfMCeKhOTYrGIzCzexumkE8Mv6istT9ptIVQE3zuqqq8lNnaW1DJ1Gp61P99+KalTiZm0Oc88an+KWGslmK5/0U=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=UaRxe7e1bm+pNDvC2aUCKE9tK0UK2CveGcXqiyr/PJ3LfGg3OgrAY8oWMs/aaRQZJ4PVnLGaEbXTix5S5oFAuG0rV3DxY4fW32kgL2Vlw1cpPkgHdezA9nwvjZ/0VDbUz6Y1o+XfPLapqPHaXrt6UhbBKZ3OBc1veYXwoVoTHl0=;
Message-ID: <346103.90889.qm@web111407.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
X-YMail-OSG: CjNAB10VM1m4Zs_t.9FiFfe8ebycHfUg4HVS9jfwLdc3y33InRXt7cw05X8lNNH3Dy9DaFyIIC2aTb51F4Pr4Fs0eF3rNAbT3wX6_uZYRyZK9gqHhf5v_4E.btLSeD56o5fnC9XsnBgtOaq2Fgz87uKroJOgYL.EXWH3Ff_XMjgukPZMlV1xnJfeRHHwb8kB8D_vHkPwFiW87U270uFfTYMxNDea_bmPbDyGjo6i2fKpeB1hziU9tuOBE9Rw3Gw3zKKoVgVnlG4QgEvb3J3UsWnc8be.yZX6hKexH24HAB8uzQxVCaCfuuVQbRv9TasfOVspVsMKledHQY40jS9Gq4tjgBLgFgTXnxgF7XxBM0DrCA--
Received: from [206.16.17.212] by web111407.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 20 Oct 2009 08:11:13 PDT
X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/182.10 YahooMailWebService/0.7.361.3
References: <C703464A.FCC4%hesham@elevatemobile.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 08:11:13 -0700
From: Behcet Sarikaya <behcetsarikaya@yahoo.com>
To: Hesham Soliman <hesham@elevatemobile.com>, Conny Larsson <conny.larsson@ericsson.com>, "Laganier, Julien" <julienl@qualcomm.com>
In-Reply-To: <C703464A.FCC4%hesham@elevatemobile.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: "mext@ietf.org" <mext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MEXT] [WGLC] draft-ietf-mext-flow-binding-03
X-BeenThere: mext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya@ieee.org>
List-Id: Mobile IPv6 EXTensions WG <mext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mext>
List-Post: <mailto:mext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:11:08 -0000

Hi Conny, Hesham,



----- Original Message ----
> From: Hesham Soliman <hesham@elevatemobile.com>
> To: Conny Larsson <conny.larsson@ericsson.com>; "Laganier, Julien" <julienl@qualcomm.com>
> Cc: "mext@ietf.org" <mext@ietf.org>
> Sent: Mon, October 19, 2009 6:49:46 PM
> Subject: Re: [MEXT] [WGLC] draft-ietf-mext-flow-binding-03
> 
> Hi Conny, 
> 
> We need the comments now, not after the document is updated :). This is WGLC
> and we're updating the document as a result of reviews.
> 
> The bidirectionality issue was discussed and it was decided that there is no
> case for it. 

I don't think this reflects the situation.

The right answer is that flow revocation and possibly other flow binding operations initiated by HA will be taken up as part of MEXT rechartering.

BTW we revised our draft, here is the link to the revised draft:

http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-xia-mext-ha-init-flow-binding-01.txt


Regards,

Behcet

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email