Re: [MEXT] Moving forward with MEXT documents -draft-ietf-mip6-hareliability-04

Behcet Sarikaya <behcetsarikaya@yahoo.com> Fri, 01 May 2009 20:27 UTC

Return-Path: <behcetsarikaya@yahoo.com>
X-Original-To: mext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A0323A69B4 for <mext@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 May 2009 13:27:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.456
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.456 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.254, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EaqrRaKOZimh for <mext@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 May 2009 13:27:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from n64.bullet.mail.sp1.yahoo.com (n64.bullet.mail.sp1.yahoo.com [98.136.44.189]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E63203A6C33 for <mext@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 May 2009 13:25:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [69.147.84.144] by n64.bullet.mail.sp1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 May 2009 20:27:05 -0000
Received: from [67.195.9.81] by t6.bullet.mail.sp1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 May 2009 20:27:05 -0000
Received: from [67.195.9.110] by t1.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 May 2009 20:27:04 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp114.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 May 2009 20:24:51 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 707267.69476.bm@omp114.mail.gq1.yahoo.com
Received: (qmail 27774 invoked by uid 60001); 1 May 2009 20:27:03 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1241209623; bh=QEQhHo35WkQsgQ2yoi9am64NRxtrvHQ8zoqUcZjwcCE=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=dB9LG7GoBjx4rRJHfW7z+lLh7B+F/c2UaLDejUte6+5Q6cqf08xYJFbACcQStN8wsgAm6Ic9JkPWIfTdFivvN+or+nkaQglspSr6SPq1dpJyE5eoKAlteqoE4tkJrgTGBRj7j8vKQg8RLV1zISQxodcJhbDw6WT8fJT1aOK7NJ0=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=qOzbo1bYwLQs+0exlyknabsZl2UKLiT6lLBMsvw0JN7X3UG17pVrSRy9HkfGIOeoU5OSLiF3IeIXiRLjX/6rx/u/4WHypaziV6fr1R/9byWe+bBAZf/Fc0ezr+SgKn67zcg9h+fkIVjmlnCy7G0qN2Hz2wASdjF0PxQ+Imhoxuc=;
Message-ID: <874135.27179.qm@web111403.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
X-YMail-OSG: RruUGxcVM1mT6TkxVIc_vQy6Kphcm2O7UpaSskkAuP0x_xaeP4msQ0SQlvRHTnMg52ktdUBZxw0ArTx9Kyn.rlj17m.1f2fiQCfiu0whzDKYx0IDDwgCzMSeIa5He_mKlSDnXIHAA.gfXssbhU0tMxnpYBFd3o.v4yKyPQz_GIzoR0BQv0U6R0OfxG_gfYv2G2c04TmTgPNXmwkZUCTFqjisJ4J6y7AsaPjwSAzlQ0_8mtwlpbdxGe2x_D4aoPBf8CMvgVxAiMHAPrEVoimWhzk1PtCd3YgePXN9jNqtryXyZg09RmTI1TJFrBunjWCVWDwg
Received: from [206.16.17.212] by web111403.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 01 May 2009 13:27:03 PDT
X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/1277.35 YahooMailWebService/0.7.289.1
References: <49EF37D8.2010408@it.uc3m.es> <49FAC1A2.7060206@it.uc3m.es>
Date: Fri, 01 May 2009 13:27:03 -0700
From: Behcet Sarikaya <behcetsarikaya@yahoo.com>
To: marcelo bagnulo braun <marcelo@it.uc3m.es>
In-Reply-To: <49FAC1A2.7060206@it.uc3m.es>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-240955171-1241209623=:27179"
Cc: mext <mext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MEXT] Moving forward with MEXT documents -draft-ietf-mip6-hareliability-04
X-BeenThere: mext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya@ieee.org>
List-Id: Mobile IPv6 EXTensions WG <mext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mext>
List-Post: <mailto:mext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 May 2009 20:27:01 -0000

Hi Marcelo,
  Here is my review for the HA Reliability draft:

This draft describes two methods of switching HAs in case of failure: virtual switch in which HAs themselves detect failure and HA2 takes over HA1 and hard switch in which a standby HA notifies MN to register with it.

Any improvements: yes, the document can cover the local mobility anchor reliability. All the messages defined in the draft are exchanged by HAs so they would apply to LMAs as well. Virtual switch will be almost the same. Maybe some work for the hard switch due to the architectural differences.

Nits:
Informative References ID-HAHA ID-LOCALHAHA ID-PS-HARELIABILITY if there are any co-authors, they don't appear.

7.5.2. s/in-active/inactive
1. RFC-3776 why not replace with RFC-4877 which updated 3776?


Regards,

Behcet


________________________________
From: marcelo bagnulo braun <marcelo@it.uc3m.es>
To: mext <mext@ietf.org>
Cc: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
Sent: Friday, May 1, 2009 4:32:18 AM
Subject: Re: [MEXT] Moving forward with MEXT documents

FWIW, the deadline for this is about the expire and we only received a couple of volunteers so far.

marcelo bagnulo braun escribió:
> Hi,
> 
> At this point in time, the WG has the following documents that are ready for WGLC:
> 
> draft-ietf-mext-firewall-admin-00          draft-ietf-mext-firewall-vendor-00          draft-ietf-mip6-hareliability-04        draft-ietf-monami6-mipv6-analysis-05        draft-ietf-monami6-multihoming-motivation-scenario-03
> 
> And the following document that we need to ask for adoption:
> 
> draft-premec-mext-extended-home-link-01
> 
> According to our new ground rules, each of these documents to proceed will need 5 thorough reviews. Since this is a considerable amount of effort from the WG, we would like soem feedback on how to manage this effort. In particular, we would like to get feedback from the WG about which documents should we issue the WGLC or adoption call first and if possible volunteers to do the reviews for the documents.
> 
> We will receive input on this till the 3rd of may and then decide how to move forward.
> 
> Regards, marcelo
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> MEXT mailing list
> MEXT@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
> 

_______________________________________________
MEXT mailing list
MEXT@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext