IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MEXT] Moving forward with MEXT documents

Ryuji Wakikawa <ryuji.wakikawa@gmail.com> Mon, 04 May 2009 18:10 UTC

Return-Path: <ryuji.wakikawa@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 786AA3A7043 for <mext@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 May 2009 11:10:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eZsJ94jsqpU3 for <mext@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 May 2009 11:10:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.229]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAAA53A6C1E for <mext@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 May 2009 11:10:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id g37so2666178rvb.49 for <mext@ietf.org>; Mon, 04 May 2009 11:11:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:in-reply-to:subject :references:message-id:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:date:cc:x-mailer; bh=PWjnMCIRCbRKmGQ453a3AnaIkhlI0hK2YuggaFAo19E=; b=SBjdUXQic9h89Qh/WqbURVYsgycK684iVG6yN38xEA3RXc0tLLhnrtvXaVebKwDRK1 S4PJEu46is3WjwtmOF0tx+pYh7lw4pGPg9TMfMilmLH3nsmW2w9JJxjBv6oK9zYWPS7A dPxmDaEAdPi7xCo5Vxup1dWJ+ldy1xdI/i9D0=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:in-reply-to:subject:references:message-id:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:date:cc:x-mailer; b=xSsryJ/+LSm+PrEKfvM5idDjiG4cOYEvt5IT32gq+fnDMIzKe/0Nl0H1iT/+cZ3/ku QCq8UjysCuUA29b+rKVYJW0hvqWSU6BeN2qEq74KnmAHYuSyRbq23ZmItVfSm2sf/80I IPGZ2DdfvlLUTKCOCW8jmzIkOaIdEWnPCHCyw=
Received: by 10.141.137.16 with SMTP id p16mr2195109rvn.180.1241460711984; Mon, 04 May 2009 11:11:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?192.168.110.115? ([206.132.173.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g14sm15910542rvb.2.2009.05.04.11.11.49 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 04 May 2009 11:11:51 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ryuji Wakikawa <ryuji.wakikawa@gmail.com>
To: marcelo bagnulo braun <marcelo@it.uc3m.es>
In-Reply-To: <49EF37D8.2010408@it.uc3m.es>
References: <49EF37D8.2010408@it.uc3m.es>
Message-Id: <5BD29D7D-9C20-42CC-9C75-35AAEA70FD82@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3)
Date: Mon, 04 May 2009 11:11:48 -0700
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3)
Cc: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>, mext <mext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MEXT] Moving forward with MEXT documents
X-BeenThere: mext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile IPv6 EXTensions WG <mext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mext>
List-Post: <mailto:mext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 May 2009 18:10:28 -0000

Hi Marcelo,

1. The following two document are ready for WGLC.
     These documents are stable for long time.
     WGLC can be done at the same time.
      draft-ietf-monami6-mipv6-analysis-05
      draft-ietf-monami6-multihoming-motivation-scenario-03

2. draft-ietf-mip6-hareliability
     This document is also stable for a long time.
     The WGLC is good phase to receive the inputs from MEXT.

3. These are -00 documents. I don't remember if they have any comments  
after -00.
     If there are any, it's better to wait for -01 documents.
     draft-ietf-mext-firewall-admin/vendor

regards,
ryuji

On 2009/04/22, at 8:29, marcelo bagnulo braun wrote:

> Hi,
>
> At this point in time, the WG has the following documents that are  
> ready for WGLC:
>
> draft-ietf-mext-firewall-admin-00           draft-ietf-mext-firewall- 
> vendor-00          draft-ietf-mip6-hareliability-04        draft- 
> ietf-monami6-mipv6-analysis-05         draft-ietf-monami6- 
> multihoming-motivation-scenario-03
>
> And the following document that we need to ask for adoption:
>
> draft-premec-mext-extended-home-link-01
>
> According to our new ground rules, each of these documents to  
> proceed will need 5 thorough reviews. Since this is a considerable  
> amount of effort from the WG, we would like soem feedback on how to  
> manage this effort. In particular, we would like to get feedback  
> from the WG about which documents should we issue the WGLC or  
> adoption call first and if possible volunteers to do the reviews for  
> the documents.
>
> We will receive input on this till the 3rd of may and then decide  
> how to move forward.
>
> Regards, marcelo
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> MEXT mailing list
> MEXT@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email