[middisc] Next steps.

"Anantha Ramaiah (ananth)" <ananth@cisco.com> Sun, 01 April 2012 14:40 UTC

Return-Path: <ananth@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: middisc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: middisc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CB3F21F8E25 for <middisc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Apr 2012 07:40:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.598
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mLBc20B88ZKu for <middisc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Apr 2012 07:40:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mtv-iport-3.cisco.com (mtv-iport-3.cisco.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4AE721F8E21 for <middisc@ietf.org>; Sun, 1 Apr 2012 07:40:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=ananth@cisco.com; l=5707; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1333291226; x=1334500826; h=mime-version:subject:date:message-id:from:to:cc; bh=iUP2stS2KZ838ZHdnkJlQkAgPBxmjCoOnLwWhLB56Qg=; b=AeiwlL1nZEL02eIqdYJSUrP6Deay8/Tk7GrORWEOhhL/GLwZEENdFfMV KseVsQFxpIHjWkG6rcDaz6+vKb+loMcAsSmut2pZFuqFptTG2jNvHm3aT Lriqrr9wJPfMSzl3zQNywt+SzK8TNelArL8HGRerjv8qFeXaYCx4QpSpR s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av8EAKloeE+rRDoH/2dsb2JhbABEgka2OIEHggsBBBIBCREDSRIBKgYYB1cBBBsah2YBmzSeCY14gkFjBIhYm1CBaIMH
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.75,353,1330905600"; d="scan'208,217"; a="36004116"
Received: from mtv-core-2.cisco.com ([]) by mtv-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 01 Apr 2012 14:40:16 +0000
Received: from xbh-sjc-221.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-221.cisco.com []) by mtv-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q31EeG9o015192; Sun, 1 Apr 2012 14:40:16 GMT
Received: from xmb-sjc-23e.amer.cisco.com ([]) by xbh-sjc-221.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sun, 1 Apr 2012 07:40:16 -0700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CD1015.5A63DBD5"
Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2012 07:40:15 -0700
Message-ID: <1F8E0A684D3FF54680294BCFE57A7DB504C92890@xmb-sjc-23e.amer.cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: Next steps.
Thread-Index: Ac0QFVnqG3uUBBolQ2qgrl1A2I/lPQ==
From: "Anantha Ramaiah (ananth)" <ananth@cisco.com>
To: <middisc@ietf.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Apr 2012 14:40:16.0373 (UTC) FILETIME=[5A95B250:01CD1015]
Cc: Pasi Sarolahti <pasi.sarolahti@iki.fi>
Subject: [middisc] Next steps.
X-BeenThere: middisc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussions on TCP option for middlebox discovery." <middisc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/middisc>, <mailto:middisc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/middisc>
List-Post: <mailto:middisc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:middisc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/middisc>, <mailto:middisc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2012 14:40:27 -0000


        During this IETF in Paris, I had to chance to speak to Wes on
the remaining items moving forward on this draft. They are :-

-          We need to revise the draft with all the comments received
and submit the next version. I hope to incorporate these comments soon
and send it out for review.

-          Pasi (who is the TCPM co-chair) would be involved in doing a
proto-write up after reviewing the draft and suggesting any comments.
Thanks for your time and volunteering to do the review and write-up,


One stuff which I would like to know is "what is the TCP option number
used by Citrix for middlebox auto-discovery?" We have all (major ones)
other players TCP option number's it would be nice to put Citrix if we
have that. I remember that there is a Citrix person in this alias. There
is a also a person from Juniper in this alias. If they are indeed doing
Wan-Opt and using unassigned TCP option numbers, please speak up.