Re: [mif-arch-dt] sections 4.3 and 4.4

Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> Mon, 09 September 2013 13:42 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: mif-arch-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mif-arch-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC09621F9B85 for <mif-arch-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Sep 2013 06:42:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eeOys5EH97sP for <mif-arch-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Sep 2013 06:42:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og102.obsmtp.com (exprod7og102.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.157]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ECC821F9A65 for <mif-arch-dt@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Sep 2013 06:41:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shell-too.nominum.com ([64.89.228.229]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob102.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUi3QB0JF27bav5RND5sUTJlXzjtvKWTL@postini.com; Mon, 09 Sep 2013 06:41:28 PDT
Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC0D61B80E0 for <mif-arch-dt@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Sep 2013 06:41:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-02.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93062190074; Mon, 9 Sep 2013 06:41:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Ted.Lemon@nominum.com)
Received: from MBX-01.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.133]) by CAS-02.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.132]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Mon, 9 Sep 2013 06:41:26 -0700
From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
To: "pierrick.seite@orange.com" <pierrick.seite@orange.com>
Thread-Topic: [mif-arch-dt] sections 4.3 and 4.4
Thread-Index: AQHOqvG93VN5NDwZhkGbPpVPJJAPNpm5eWWAgAQVLACAAFVygA==
Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2013 13:41:25 +0000
Message-ID: <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B63077527C6F0@mbx-01.win.nominum.com>
References: <Prayer.1.3.5.1308010729000.16712@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk> <COL125-W16BB859A16CE25C980383AB1340@phx.gbl> <D60519DB022FFA48974A25955FFEC08C054A3B51@SAM.InterDigital.com> <CBB0A6EF-8171-4714-B565-487D2E47AAE3@nominum.com> <4142_1378715736_522D8858_4142_270_4_81C77F07008CA24F9783A98CFD706F7111D1C6@PEXCVZYM12.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
In-Reply-To: <4142_1378715736_522D8858_4142_270_4_81C77F07008CA24F9783A98CFD706F7111D1C6@PEXCVZYM12.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [192.168.1.10]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-ID: <054534A74103C94791C9AD6A5ECF9EB4@nominum.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "mif-arch-dt@ietf.org" <mif-arch-dt@ietf.org>, "Zuniga, Juan Carlos" <JuanCarlos.Zuniga@InterDigital.com>
Subject: Re: [mif-arch-dt] sections 4.3 and 4.4
X-BeenThere: mif-arch-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: MIF Architecture Design Team mailing list <mif-arch-dt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mif-arch-dt>, <mailto:mif-arch-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mif-arch-dt>
List-Post: <mailto:mif-arch-dt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mif-arch-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif-arch-dt>, <mailto:mif-arch-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2013 13:42:33 -0000

On Sep 9, 2013, at 4:35 AM, pierrick.seite@orange.com wrote:
> Apparently, current text is not clear enough :-), we will revise it accordingly.

Thanks!   :)