[mif-arch-dt] FW: Next step

[Hui Deng <[e-mail]>]

 > Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 09:57:21 -0400
> From: [e-mail]
> To: [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> Subject: Re: [mif-arch-dt] Next step
> 
> Hi Hui/Margaret,
>   Here are my slides.
> 
> Thanks
> Suresh
> 
> On 05/13/2013 06:32 AM, Hui Deng wrote:
> > Hi all
> >  
> > We didn't get sufficent submissions this time, if you have time ,
> > please kindly help to take some time NOW to write down and send to
> > Margaret and Hui.
> >  
> > Thanks,
> >  
> > -Hui
> >  
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > From: [e-mail]
> > To: [e-mail]
> > Date: Thu, 9 May 2013 15:12:38 +0800
> > Subject: Re: [mif-arch-dt] Next step
> > 
> > Hello all
> >  
> > Please kindly help to forward to Margaret and me or circulate your
> > writing about the discussions before this sunday, then we could have a
> > teleconf next Monday.,
> >  
> > Reference example Ted has given during last teleconf is :
> > 1) let's talk about HTTP, From HTTP prospective, we trust one of them?
> > If we don't trust to any, try low cost / whatever, if not - do HE.
> > 2) DHCP - is a config provider, this is how e.g. it could tag the info,
> > this is how it could be done at ND.
> >  
> > enclosed is minutes and information elements,
> >  
> > thanks a lot
> >  
> > -Hui
> >  
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > From: [e-mail]
> > To: [e-mail]
> > Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 22:25:07 +0800
> > Subject: [mif-arch-dt] Next step
> > 
> > Hello all
> >  
> > Thanks a lot for Dmitry, Pierrick, Ding, Marc for their kind help to
> > write the minutes.
> > enclosed are minutes and infomormation element list.
> >  
> > Based on the teleconf and some offline conformation, Let's move forward
> > with the following arrangement.:
> >  
> > 1) Everybody try to help to contribute the discussion on information
> > element, during the minutes, you can see some reference which Ted has
> > explained how to write them. if possible, please send your discussion to
> > Margaret and Hui by May 10th.
> >  
> > 2) MIF PS RFC could be considered to be updated if there is further
> > valid scenario/example coming in, Marc is volunteer to watch it.
> >  
> > 3) if you can, please help to propose a definition of MPvD
> > 4) We are going to use PvD to represent Provisioning Domain, MPvD to
> > represent Multiple Provisioining Domain
> >  
> > 5) Next teleconf: May 13th, (Monday), Same time,
> >  
> > Feel free to share your comments,
> > thanks a lot for your volunteer.
> >  
> > Best regards,
> >  
> > -Margaret & Hui
> >  
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 10:13:06 +0300
> > From: [e-mail]
> > To: [e-mail]
> > CC: [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> > Subject: [mif-arch-dt] MIF Arch testing techniques
> > 
> > Dear all,
> > 
> > As discussed during our meeting after Zhen's presentation
> > 
> > Dave Thaler: for existing "testing" techniques see discussion in Happy
> > Eyeballs, and also in
> > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-behave-nat64-learn-analysis-03
> > 
> > There is a comprehensive one from Teemu, Jouni and UH
> > http://www.cs.helsinki.fi/group/wibra/icc12.html
> > 
> > pdf and brief all included for reference.
> > 
> > -- Aaron
> > 
> > _______________________________________________ mif-arch-dt mailing list
> > [e-mail] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif-arch-dt
> > 
> > _______________________________________________ mif-arch-dt mailing list
> > [e-mail] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif-arch-dt
> > 
> > _______________________________________________ mif-arch-dt mailing list
> > [e-mail] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif-arch-dt
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > mif-arch-dt mailing list
> > [e-mail]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif-arch-dt
> > 
>