Re: [mif-arch-dt] Next step
Hui Deng <denghui02@hotmail.com> Thu, 09 May 2013 07:12 UTC
Return-Path: <denghui02@hotmail.com>
X-Original-To: mif-arch-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mif-arch-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12F0A21F9021 for <mif-arch-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 May 2013 00:12:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -99.645
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.645 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_44=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_93=0.6, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dXSNE-jOU53D for <mif-arch-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 May 2013 00:12:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from col0-omc4-s5.col0.hotmail.com (col0-omc4-s5.col0.hotmail.com [65.55.34.207]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9369621F9003 for <mif-arch-dt@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 May 2013 00:12:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from COL125-W21 ([65.55.34.199]) by col0-omc4-s5.col0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 9 May 2013 00:12:38 -0700
X-EIP: [eVjIp6EE+MR2EQ7Zr0ce+OEfAM6UgbIeDnRq9gN0hPo=]
X-Originating-Email: [denghui02@hotmail.com]
Message-ID: <COL125-W21ED7170E01B075B111996B1A40@phx.gbl>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="_a3fe2f09-6b5c-481c-b375-7f6590115eec_"
From: Hui Deng <denghui02@hotmail.com>
To: "mif-arch-dt@ietf.org" <mif-arch-dt@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 09 May 2013 15:12:38 +0800
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <COL125-W148D8878BBC5F2FDDD87A5B1B70@phx.gbl>
References: <CANF0JMBsryV1=MeZxxG-aEOhWpXJVkxgG9-pX0a2R2pHO0ORDw@mail.gmail.com>, , , , <0B440004-85A2-422A-9269-3DDA8FAF0B80@viagenie.ca>, , , , <CANF0JMAaGFqcSohFcyq4NMjwfEidBZuJ4jrJ2T8OOA8WBL78oA@mail.gmail.com>, , , , <7B3F1A5D-E037-4277-8945-AF419CFD8DC5@lilacglade.org>, , , <COL125-W526C6F4C48D66547835A0B1CE0@phx.gbl>, , , <44E744236D325141AE8DDC88A45908ADCB8C19@TK5EX14MBXC266.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>, , <COL125-W2355BDC500C735BCC51C3AB1CF0@phx.gbl>, , <44E744236D325141AE8DDC88A45908ADCB8D02@TK5EX14MBXC266.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>, , <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B63077514F463@mbx-01.win.nominum.com>, , <51778602.3080604@cs.helsinki.fi>, <COL125-W148D8878BBC5F2FDDD87A5B1B70@phx.gbl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 May 2013 07:12:38.0447 (UTC) FILETIME=[967CABF0:01CE4C84]
Subject: Re: [mif-arch-dt] Next step
X-BeenThere: mif-arch-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: MIF Architecture Design Team mailing list <mif-arch-dt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mif-arch-dt>, <mailto:mif-arch-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mif-arch-dt>
List-Post: <mailto:mif-arch-dt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mif-arch-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif-arch-dt>, <mailto:mif-arch-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 May 2013 07:12:44 -0000
Hello all Please kindly help to forward to Margaret and me or circulate your writing about the discussions before this sunday, then we could have a teleconf next Monday., Reference example Ted has given during last teleconf is : 1) let's talk about HTTP, From HTTP prospective, we trust one of them? If we don't trust to any, try low cost / whatever, if not - do HE. 2) DHCP - is a config provider, this is how e.g. it could tag the info, this is how it could be done at ND. enclosed is minutes and information elements, thanks a lot -Hui From: denghui02@hotmail.com To: mif-arch-dt@ietf.org Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 22:25:07 +0800 Subject: [mif-arch-dt] Next step Hello all Thanks a lot for Dmitry, Pierrick, Ding, Marc for their kind help to write the minutes. enclosed are minutes and infomormation element list. Based on the teleconf and some offline conformation, Let's move forward with the following arrangement.: 1) Everybody try to help to contribute the discussion on information element, during the minutes, you can see some reference which Ted has explained how to write them. if possible, please send your discussion to Margaret and Hui by May 10th. 2) MIF PS RFC could be considered to be updated if there is further valid scenario/example coming in, Marc is volunteer to watch it. 3) if you can, please help to propose a definition of MPvD 4) We are going to use PvD to represent Provisioning Domain, MPvD to represent Multiple Provisioining Domain 5) Next teleconf: May 13th, (Monday), Same time, Feel free to share your comments,thanks a lot for your volunteer. Best regards, -Margaret & Hui Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 10:13:06 +0300 From: yding@cs.helsinki.fi To: mif-arch-dt@ietf.org CC: zehn.cao@gmail.com; dthaler@microsoft.com Subject: [mif-arch-dt] MIF Arch testing techniques Dear all, As discussed during our meeting after Zhen's presentation Dave Thaler: for existing "testing" techniques see discussion in Happy Eyeballs, and also in http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-behave-nat64-learn-analysis-03 There is a comprehensive one from Teemu, Jouni and UH http://www.cs.helsinki.fi/group/wibra/icc12.html pdf and brief all included for reference. -- Aaron _______________________________________________ mif-arch-dt mailing list mif-arch-dt@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif-arch-dt _______________________________________________ mif-arch-dt mailing list mif-arch-dt@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif-arch-dt
- Re: [Mif-arch-dt] Merge or prioritize Margaret Wasserman
- Re: [mif-arch-dt] [Mif-arch-dt] Merge or prioriti… Hui Deng
- Re: [mif-arch-dt] [Mif-arch-dt] Merge or prioriti… Ted Lemon
- Re: [mif-arch-dt] [Mif-arch-dt] Merge or prioriti… Dmitry Anipko
- Re: [mif-arch-dt] [Mif-arch-dt] Merge or prioriti… Zuniga, Juan Carlos
- Re: [mif-arch-dt] [Mif-arch-dt] Merge or prioriti… Ted Lemon
- Re: [mif-arch-dt] [Mif-arch-dt] Merge or prioriti… Ted Lemon
- Re: [mif-arch-dt] [Mif-arch-dt] Merge or prioriti… pierrick.seite
- Re: [mif-arch-dt] [Mif-arch-dt] Merge or prioriti… Cao,Zhen
- Re: [mif-arch-dt] [Mif-arch-dt] Merge or prioriti… Hui Deng
- Re: [mif-arch-dt] [Mif-arch-dt] Merge or prioriti… Dapeng Liu
- Re: [mif-arch-dt] [Mif-arch-dt] Merge or prioriti… Jouni Korhonen
- Re: [mif-arch-dt] [Mif-arch-dt] Merge or prioriti… Jouni Korhonen
- Re: [mif-arch-dt] [Mif-arch-dt] Merge or prioriti… Dave Thaler
- Re: [mif-arch-dt] [Mif-arch-dt] Merge or prioriti… Hui Deng
- Re: [mif-arch-dt] [Mif-arch-dt] Merge or prioriti… Hui Deng
- Re: [mif-arch-dt] [Mif-arch-dt] Merge or prioriti… Dave Thaler
- Re: [mif-arch-dt] [Mif-arch-dt] Merge or prioriti… Hui Deng
- Re: [mif-arch-dt] [Mif-arch-dt] Merge or prioriti… Ted Lemon
- Re: [mif-arch-dt] Merge or prioritize Ted Lemon
- Re: [mif-arch-dt] [Mif-arch-dt] Merge or prioriti… Ted Lemon
- [mif-arch-dt] MIF Arch testing techniques Aaron Yi DING
- [mif-arch-dt] Next step Hui Deng
- Re: [mif-arch-dt] MIF Arch testing techniques Cao Zhen (CZ)
- Re: [mif-arch-dt] Next step Hui Deng
- Re: [mif-arch-dt] Next step Hui Deng
- [mif-arch-dt] FW: Next step Hui Deng