[mif] FW: Review requested: draft-ietf-mif-dhcpv6-route-option

Hui Deng <denghui02@hotmail.com> Fri, 28 October 2011 18:07 UTC

Return-Path: <denghui02@hotmail.com>
X-Original-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84B0921F86C1 for <mif@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 11:07:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MofW7rAvoCwE for <mif@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 11:07:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from col0-omc2-s7.col0.hotmail.com (col0-omc2-s7.col0.hotmail.com [65.55.34.81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF3FA21F86A5 for <mif@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 11:07:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from COL118-W38 ([65.55.34.73]) by col0-omc2-s7.col0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 28 Oct 2011 11:07:20 -0700
Message-ID: <COL118-W380DB46BD2C899FA745788B1D30@phx.gbl>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_eee32fd6-09b7-405b-ace5-eb87c17e271a_"
X-Originating-IP: [117.136.0.107]
From: Hui Deng <denghui02@hotmail.com>
To: <mif@ietf.org>
Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2011 02:07:20 +0800
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <5B6B2B64C9FE2A489045EEEADDAFF2C3032A71C3@XMB-RCD-109.cisco.com>
References: <4EAAA9FE.9030600@innovationslab.net> <CAD06408.17DC0D%wbeebee@cisco.com>, <5B6B2B64C9FE2A489045EEEADDAFF2C3032A71C3@XMB-RCD-109.cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Oct 2011 18:07:20.0852 (UTC) FILETIME=[6FB5BD40:01CC959C]
Subject: [mif] FW: Review requested: draft-ietf-mif-dhcpv6-route-option
X-BeenThere: mif@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiple Interface Discussion List <mif.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mif>
List-Post: <mailto:mif@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 18:07:22 -0000

Just want to remind that there is on-going review in 6MAN for this draft.
 
thanks
 
-Hui
 

> Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 12:58:06 -0500
> From: shemant@cisco.com
> To: wbeebee@cisco.com; brian@innovationslab.net; ipv6@ietf.org
> CC: 6man-ads@tools.ietf.org; bob.hinden@gmail.com; mif-chairs@tools.ietf.org
> Subject: RE: Review requested: draft-ietf-mif-dhcpv6-route-option
> 
> This is precisely the question that I and Bernie Volz asked a year or
> two back. Similarly when it was discussed to add a DNS option to the
> IPv6 ND RA when the DNS option was already supported by DHCPv6. The
> question was if the receiving node gets the same information from two
> different sources, which information wins? What if one information was
> fat-fingered at the SP provisioning system while the other was not? We
> should look at the RFC that added the DNS option to the RA and see if
> that RFC has a section regarding this question and we could copy that
> guidance.
> 
> Hemant
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Wes Beebee (wbeebee)
> Sent: Friday, October 28, 2011 1:52 PM
> To: Brian Haberman; IPv6 WG Mailing List
> Cc: 6man-ads@tools.ietf.org; Bob Hinden; mif-chairs@tools.ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Review requested: draft-ietf-mif-dhcpv6-route-option
> 
> What happens when both RA and DHCPv6 are configured?
> 
> - Wes
> 
> On 10/28/11 9:11 AM, "Brian Haberman" <brian@innovationslab.net> wrote:
> 
> > All,
> > The MIF WG is currently defining a DHCPv6 option for defining
> > routes (including default routes) on client nodes. Please review the
> > draft and provide any feedback you have.
> > 
> > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mif-dhcpv6-route-option-03
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Brian
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> > ipv6@ietf.org
> > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------