Re: [mif] #5: only one default route? (there should be multiple, as for MIF WG)
"mif issue tracker" <trac+mif@trac.tools.ietf.org> Wed, 01 August 2012 21:19 UTC
Return-Path: <trac+mif@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9B2111E832A for <mif@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 14:19:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yv4VwsaP+acw for <mif@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 14:19:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from grenache.tools.ietf.org (grenache.tools.ietf.org [77.72.230.30]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 160B811E8322 for <mif@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 14:19:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55121 helo=grenache.tools.ietf.org ident=www-data) by grenache.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from <trac+mif@trac.tools.ietf.org>) id 1SwgKK-0006G4-DW; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 23:19:32 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: mif issue tracker <trac+mif@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Version: 0.12.2
Precedence: bulk
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.2, by Edgewall Software
To: alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com
X-Trac-Project: mif
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 21:19:32 -0000
X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/mif/
X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/mif/trac/ticket/5#comment:4
Message-ID: <081.eb2c3cf6a2fb794938056e1e1108ebf3@trac.tools.ietf.org>
References: <066.e7ab587a28a110b750f149a32ad4c783@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 5
In-Reply-To: <066.e7ab587a28a110b750f149a32ad4c783@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com, mif@ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+mif@trac.tools.ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on grenache.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 15:26:40 -0700
Cc: mif@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [mif] #5: only one default route? (there should be multiple, as for MIF WG)
X-BeenThere: mif@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
List-Id: Multiple Interface Discussion List <mif.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mif>
List-Post: <mailto:mif@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 21:19:35 -0000
#5: only one default route? (there should be multiple, as for MIF WG) Comment (by alexandru.petrescu@…): On 27 March 2012 13:50, Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com> wrote: > Le 27/03/2012 15:45, Erik Kline a écrit : > >>> IMHO, my home desktop should really be able to handle >>> this too (router selection needs to consider which source >>> address was picked from which router). >> >> >> I think this is some of the stuff that 6man has been discussing. > > > Do you think that discussion may have concluded that it's not good to have > several default routes on the Client? The discussion I'm referring to is about updating the source address selection depending on the next hop. This is obviously a more complicated issue overall, of course. Unless you get it right, you're likely to run afoul of BCP38. -- -------------------------------------+--------------------------------- Reporter: alexandru.petrescu@… | Owner: Alexandru Petrescu Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: minor | Milestone: milestone1 Component: dhcpv6-route-option | Version: Severity: In WG Last Call | Resolution: Keywords: multiple default routes | -------------------------------------+--------------------------------- Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/mif/trac/ticket/5#comment:4> mif <http://tools.ietf.org/mif/>
- [mif] #5: only one default route? (there should b… mif issue tracker
- Re: [mif] #5: only one default route? (there shou… mif issue tracker
- Re: [mif] #5: only one default route? (there shou… mif issue tracker
- Re: [mif] #5: only one default route? (there shou… mif issue tracker
- Re: [mif] #5: only one default route? (there shou… mif issue tracker
- Re: [mif] #5: only one default route? (there shou… mif issue tracker
- Re: [mif] #5: only one default route? (there shou… mif issue tracker
- Re: [mif] #5: only one default route? (there shou… mif issue tracker
- Re: [mif] #5: only one default route? (there shou… mif issue tracker
- Re: [mif] #5: only one default route? (there shou… mif issue tracker
- Re: [mif] #5: only one default route? (there shou… mif issue tracker