Re: [mif] #5: only one default route? (there should be multiple, as for MIF WG)

"mif issue tracker" <trac+mif@trac.tools.ietf.org> Wed, 01 August 2012 21:19 UTC

Return-Path: <trac+mif@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82B5011E833A for <mif@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 14:19:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RgEAh4wBZ2Hy for <mif@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 14:19:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from grenache.tools.ietf.org (grenache.tools.ietf.org [77.72.230.30]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60C5811E8339 for <mif@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 14:19:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55090 helo=grenache.tools.ietf.org ident=www-data) by grenache.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from <trac+mif@trac.tools.ietf.org>) id 1SwgJo-0002AX-13; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 23:19:00 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: mif issue tracker <trac+mif@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Version: 0.12.2
Precedence: bulk
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.2, by Edgewall Software
To: alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com
X-Trac-Project: mif
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 21:19:00 -0000
X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/mif/
X-Trac-Ticket-URL: https://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/mif/trac/ticket/5#comment:2
Message-ID: <081.8b4d91855e0d4bf3072fa6f3e6b88ff4@trac.tools.ietf.org>
References: <066.e7ab587a28a110b750f149a32ad4c783@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 5
In-Reply-To: <066.e7ab587a28a110b750f149a32ad4c783@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com, mif@ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+mif@trac.tools.ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on grenache.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 15:26:40 -0700
Cc: mif@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [mif] #5: only one default route? (there should be multiple, as for MIF WG)
X-BeenThere: mif@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
List-Id: Multiple Interface Discussion List <mif.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mif>
List-Post: <mailto:mif@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 21:19:02 -0000

#5: only one default route?  (there should be multiple, as for MIF WG)


Comment (by alexandru.petrescu@…):

 On 03/27/2012 03:31 PM, Alexandru Petrescu wrote:
 > In our implementation the DHCP Server delivers a list of default routes
 > to the Client (draft-mouton...) Also, ND configures a list of default
 > routes on the same link.

 Is also the following configuration out of scope for this group?

 - a home network with TWO ISP's providing connection
 - both without knowledge of each other
 - both send default and specific route(s) (RA or DHCP)

 IMHO, my home desktop should really be able to handle
 this too (router selection needs to consider which source
 address was picked from which router).

 _______________________________________________
 mif mailing list
 mif@ietf.org
 https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif

-- 
-------------------------------------+---------------------------------
 Reporter:  alexandru.petrescu@…     |       Owner:  Alexandru Petrescu
     Type:  enhancement              |      Status:  new
 Priority:  minor                    |   Milestone:  milestone1
Component:  dhcpv6-route-option      |     Version:
 Severity:  In WG Last Call          |  Resolution:
 Keywords:  multiple default routes  |
-------------------------------------+---------------------------------

Ticket URL: <https://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/mif/trac/ticket/5#comment:2>
mif <http://tools.ietf.org/mif/>