IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mif] dhcp route option on issue tracker

Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com> Fri, 26 October 2012 09:21 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 334D921F84F3 for <mif@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 02:21:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.085
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.085 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.164, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 83uXZL2ftqs1 for <mif@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 02:21:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sainfoin-out.extra.cea.fr (sainfoin-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.145]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 584C321F84D9 for <mif@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 02:21:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by sainfoin.extra.cea.fr (8.14.2/8.14.2/CEAnet-Internet-out-2.3) with ESMTP id q9Q9LDPX017213 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for <mif@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 11:21:13 +0200
Received: from muguet2.intra.cea.fr (muguet2.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.7]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q9Q9LDBH011012 for <mif@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 11:21:13 +0200 (envelope-from alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (is010446-4.intra.cea.fr [10.8.33.116]) by muguet2.intra.cea.fr (8.13.8/8.13.8/CEAnet-Intranet-out-1.2) with ESMTP id q9Q9L9tQ024255 for <mif@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 11:21:13 +0200
Message-ID: <508A5606.1090707@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 11:21:10 +0200
From: Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121010 Thunderbird/16.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: mif@ietf.org
References: <CABTuw1CWPrDt0PdzzAR1W1ZKm9zppWbTPyoSCPesGFpBHqSc+A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABTuw1CWPrDt0PdzzAR1W1ZKm9zppWbTPyoSCPesGFpBHqSc+A@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [mif] dhcp route option on issue tracker
X-BeenThere: mif@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiple Interface Discussion List <mif.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mif>
List-Post: <mailto:mif@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 09:21:17 -0000

Hello Arifumi,

Thank you for the email.  I am trying to udnerstand what is meant by
qualifying them as minor and trivial?  Some of them have Type as
"Enhancement".

Also, what do these qualifications mean with respect to progressing the
draft?  Does it mean they'd supposedly have to be solved in order to
progress?  (when I created some of them I was wondering the same thing).

Additionally, two issues were posted by Ivo Sedlacek " Question to
draft-ietf-mif-dhcpv6-route-option-05" on October 24th, 2012.  Shall we
discuss these 2 issues?  Should one upload these 2 issues on the tracker?

Thanks and listening to advice,

Alex

Le 26/10/2012 11:00, Arifumi Matsumoto a écrit :
> All,
>
> as far as I see the issue tracker site, only the minor or trivial
> issues are raised about the dhcp route option.
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/mif/trac/report/1
>
> Please report an issue to the sie, if you have one.
>
> Thanks. _______________________________________________ mif mailing
> list mif@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email