Re: [mif] dhcp route option on issue tracker

Alex,

first of all, thank you for filing the issues to the site.

comments inline.

2012/10/26 Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>:
> Hello Arifumi,
>
> Thank you for the email.  I am trying to udnerstand what is meant by
> qualifying them as minor and trivial?  Some of them have Type as
> "Enhancement".

I mean  Priority value listed on each issue.

> Also, what do these qualifications mean with respect to progressing the
> draft?  Does it mean they'd supposedly have to be solved in order to
> progress?  (when I created some of them I was wondering the same thing).

This document has passwd WGLC. So the progress should mean IESG review.
I think all the issues have to be solved to progess.

But, I want to have all the issues posted to the site, and try to work with
important ones if we have.

>
> Additionally, two issues were posted by Ivo Sedlacek " Question to
> draft-ietf-mif-dhcpv6-route-option-05" on October 24th, 2012.  Shall we
> discuss these 2 issues?  Should one upload these 2 issues on the tracker?

I think we do not need to upload, as far as any disagreement are not raised
to my answering comment.

Thanks.

>
> Thanks and listening to advice,
>
> Alex
>
> Le 26/10/2012 11:00, Arifumi Matsumoto a écrit :
>>
>> All,
>>
>> as far as I see the issue tracker site, only the minor or trivial
>> issues are raised about the dhcp route option.
>> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/mif/trac/report/1
>>
>> Please report an issue to the sie, if you have one.
>>
>> Thanks. _______________________________________________ mif mailing
>> list mif@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mif mailing list
> mif@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif