IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mile] ROLIE draft

"Panos Kampanakis (pkampana)" <pkampana@cisco.com> Wed, 05 March 2014 20:51 UTC

Return-Path: <pkampana@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mile@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mile@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D732F1A06DA for <mile@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 12:51:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.047
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.047 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4SR1jQ_A0hKZ for <mile@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 12:51:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F6621A04E8 for <mile@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 12:51:17 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=16289; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1394052674; x=1395262274; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=h+ys/uEXpxeGfqiRBv4JZPBBv/FPa4WcmuKgONqt3dI=; b=BAqeaNS6JRt0Ju1wKuXaNEx2DI30vRLaX5QPsj8yduDqrS1B96mFYf0s GomihFoKaOpJNFtEtIDnizYLDwDQPZ/HC+E0Md2PrHvnViGkua0XojFRb v2EcBPRgXElTqQfMzaY77IfzKludzB2/4Fzd97mPnYMuIihEb9g/Dl5Sh A=;
X-Files: image001.png : 2872
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AnMFAP+MF1OtJV2Z/2dsb2JhbABXA4JCRDtXuDKIW4EaFnSCJQEBAQQFIAgBWwIBCBEDAQEBBgEBAQIdBwIFEAEODBQJCAIEAREBBgIGh2sNzmgXjX0jFgoBFgERgxOBFASRfQGHcZB5gy2CKg
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.97,594,1389744000"; d="png'150?scan'150,208,217,150"; a="308307736"
Received: from rcdn-core-2.cisco.com ([173.37.93.153]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP; 05 Mar 2014 20:51:13 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x12.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x12.cisco.com [173.37.183.86]) by rcdn-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s25KpDAa017277 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 5 Mar 2014 20:51:13 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com ([169.254.15.151]) by xhc-rcd-x12.cisco.com ([173.37.183.86]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 14:51:13 -0600
From: "Panos Kampanakis (pkampana)" <pkampana@cisco.com>
To: "jfield@gopivotal.com" <jfield@gopivotal.com>, "mile@ietf.org" <mile@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [mile] ROLIE draft
Thread-Index: AQHPN+I1o87yqNNbYkOQZECXR0groprS+Q0A
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 20:51:12 +0000
Message-ID: <1C9F17D1873AFA47A969C4DD98F98A750FAFC9BF@xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com>
References: <CAO8WYFDn5z1-pBJhCLFVLTb0K_N6kkwqqfcas_yPzuFZt7AiPw@mail.gmail.com> <CF3B8928.60A37%kent_landfield@mcafee.com>
In-Reply-To: <CF3B8928.60A37%kent_landfield@mcafee.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [64.102.89.111]
Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="_004_1C9F17D1873AFA47A969C4DD98F98A750FAFC9BFxmbrcdx10ciscoc_"; type="multipart/alternative"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mile/-7CTtvUGx6rBMB_aP2keChegOw8
Subject: Re: [mile] ROLIE draft
X-BeenThere: mile@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Managed Incident Lightweight Exchange, IODEF extensions and RID exchanges" <mile.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mile>, <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mile/>
List-Post: <mailto:mile@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mile>, <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 20:51:21 -0000

I think rolie has advantages, so +1.
Panos

From: mile [mailto:mile-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Kent_Landfield@McAfee.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2014 2:45 PM
To: jfield@gopivotal.com; mile@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [mile] ROLIE draft

+1

Kent Landfield

Mobile: +1.817.637.8026

From: John Field <jfield@gopivotal.com<mailto:jfield@gopivotal.com>>
Date: Tuesday, March 4, 2014 at 1:03 PM
To: "mile@ietf.org<mailto:mile@ietf.org>" <mile@ietf.org<mailto:mile@ietf.org>>
Subject: [mile] ROLIE draft


Dear All,

The ROLIE draft ( http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-field-mile-rolie-02 ) whichproposed a RESTful approach to cyber security information sharing has not seen any activity in the last six months.   When the -00 draft was first posted, there was some definite interest in the idea, and there were subsequently -01 and -02 draft revisions.  However, in recent months the team has clearly been very busy pursuing other important work.

Unfortunately, due to other commitments I was not able to attend the WG meeting in London this week, and so I did not request time on the agenda.  But, given that many participants will be focused on MILE-related activities over the next few days, I thought this might be a good time to send a reminder and poll the team.  I'd like to know for planning purposes if the team thinks it will make sense to revisit the RESTful binding discussion at some point.  It would also be helpful to know if anyone has implemented, or might be considering an implementation.

Please indicate via, e.g. a simple  +1  if implementing or otherwise interested.

Thanks,
John
--

John P. Field | Security Architect | Pivotal

Direct: (908) 962-3394 | jfield@gopivotal.com<mailto:jfield@gopivotal.com>

[cid:332B1A9B-BFB1-42CC-8C13-5949BB4B8266]
goPivotal.com<http://www.goPivotal.com>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email