IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mile] ROLIE draft

<Kent_Landfield@McAfee.com> Tue, 04 March 2014 19:46 UTC

Return-Path: <Kent_Landfield@mcafee.com>
X-Original-To: mile@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mile@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F21961A01B0 for <mile@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Mar 2014 11:46:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.447
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.447 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7vod43yyDgpD for <mile@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Mar 2014 11:46:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from MIVWSMAILOUT1.mcafee.com (mivwsmailout1.mcafee.com [161.69.47.167]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E68481A00FA for <mile@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Mar 2014 11:46:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from MIVEXAMER1N2.corp.nai.org (unknown [10.48.48.12]) by MIVWSMAILOUT1.mcafee.com with smtp id 7889_bc46_c1c12ba7_ff78_4a76_8092_80e3a21c42cf; Tue, 04 Mar 2014 13:46:53 -0600
Received: from MIVEXENGN3.corp.nai.org (10.48.48.53) by MIVEXAMER1N2.corp.nai.org (10.48.48.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.174.1; Tue, 4 Mar 2014 14:44:52 -0500
Received: from MIVEXAMER1N1.corp.nai.org ([169.254.2.135]) by MIVEXENGN3.corp.nai.org ([169.254.3.139]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Tue, 4 Mar 2014 14:44:52 -0500
From: Kent_Landfield@McAfee.com
To: jfield@gopivotal.com, mile@ietf.org
Thread-Topic: [mile] ROLIE draft
Thread-Index: AQHPN+I1o87yqNNbYkOQZECXR0grog==
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 19:44:51 +0000
Message-ID: <CF3B8928.60A37%kent_landfield@mcafee.com>
References: <CAO8WYFDn5z1-pBJhCLFVLTb0K_N6kkwqqfcas_yPzuFZt7AiPw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAO8WYFDn5z1-pBJhCLFVLTb0K_N6kkwqqfcas_yPzuFZt7AiPw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.9.131030
x-originating-ip: [10.48.48.242]
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="_004_CF3B892860A37kentlandfieldmcafeecom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mile/3QdwWWMUB_YkSVrJg-pBaf4c3To
Subject: Re: [mile] ROLIE draft
X-BeenThere: mile@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Managed Incident Lightweight Exchange, IODEF extensions and RID exchanges" <mile.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mile>, <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mile/>
List-Post: <mailto:mile@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mile>, <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 19:47:00 -0000

+1

Kent Landfield
Mobile: +1.817.637.8026

From: John Field <jfield@gopivotal.com<mailto:jfield@gopivotal.com>>
Date: Tuesday, March 4, 2014 at 1:03 PM
To: "mile@ietf.org<mailto:mile@ietf.org>" <mile@ietf.org<mailto:mile@ietf.org>>
Subject: [mile] ROLIE draft


Dear All,

The ROLIE draft ( http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-field-mile-rolie-02 ) whichproposed a RESTful approach to cyber security information sharing has not seen any activity in the last six months.   When the -00 draft was first posted, there was some definite interest in the idea, and there were subsequently -01 and -02 draft revisions.  However, in recent months the team has clearly been very busy pursuing other important work.

Unfortunately, due to other commitments I was not able to attend the WG meeting in London this week, and so I did not request time on the agenda.  But, given that many participants will be focused on MILE-related activities over the next few days, I thought this might be a good time to send a reminder and poll the team.  I'd like to know for planning purposes if the team thinks it will make sense to revisit the RESTful binding discussion at some point.  It would also be helpful to know if anyone has implemented, or might be considering an implementation.

Please indicate via, e.g. a simple  +1  if implementing or otherwise interested.

Thanks,
John

--

John P. Field | Security Architect | Pivotal

Direct: (908) 962-3394 | jfield@gopivotal.com<mailto:jfield@gopivotal.com>

[cid:332B1A9B-BFB1-42CC-8C13-5949BB4B8266]

goPivotal.com<http://www.goPivotal.com>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email