IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mile] New Version Notification - draft-ietf-mile-implementreport-09.txt

Daisuke MIYAMOTO <daisu-mi@nc.u-tokyo.ac.jp> Tue, 07 June 2016 15:53 UTC

Return-Path: <daisu-mi@nc.u-tokyo.ac.jp>
X-Original-To: mile@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mile@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0333A12D7A1; Tue, 7 Jun 2016 08:53:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.326
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.326 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GMz9XeA-wl9r; Tue, 7 Jun 2016 08:53:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from skyblue2.nc.u-tokyo.ac.jp (skyblue2.nc.u-tokyo.ac.jp [133.11.124.21]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6294312D0BE; Tue, 7 Jun 2016 08:53:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:200:180:305:a5ea:59d5:177d:7182] (unknown [IPv6:2001:200:180:305:a5ea:59d5:177d:7182]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by skyblue2.nc.u-tokyo.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D5C17B9CC001; Wed, 8 Jun 2016 00:53:11 +0900 (JST)
To: internet-drafts@ietf.org, "mile@ietf.org" <mile@ietf.org>
References: <20160607154744.13732.96915.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Daisuke MIYAMOTO <daisu-mi@nc.u-tokyo.ac.jp>
Message-ID: <d8778d44-8205-eec2-ee61-6a75c930df92@nc.u-tokyo.ac.jp>
Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2016 00:53:39 +0900
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20160607154744.13732.96915.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vLTUEroRVsqgaXVuX1skoMJwaXi79wBK9"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mile/28V1d_qxG2Co-8AysoLUV9RJSho>
Subject: Re: [mile] New Version Notification - draft-ietf-mile-implementreport-09.txt
X-BeenThere: mile@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Managed Incident Lightweight Exchange, IODEF extensions and RID exchanges" <mile.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mile>, <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mile/>
List-Post: <mailto:mile@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mile>, <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2016 15:53:17 -0000

Hello!

 This -9 version clarified the SNML.

> What is SNML?  Maybe you answered that with a reference, I'm not sure
though.

 I added the
  Please see the section 6.2. The amended version used the formal name
for SNLM and described a reference [SNML].

Kind regards,
Daisuke

On 2016/06/08 0:47, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
> 
> A new version (-09) has been submitted for draft-ietf-mile-implementreport:
> https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mile-implementreport-09.txt
> 
> 
> The IETF datatracker page for this Internet-Draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mile-implementreport/
> 
> Diff from previous version:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-mile-implementreport-09
> 
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> 
> IETF Secretariat.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mile mailing list
> mile@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mile
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email