Re: [mile] ROLIE for Standards track?
Adam Montville <adam.w.montville@gmail.com> Thu, 03 August 2017 21:08 UTC
Return-Path: <adam.w.montville@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mile@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mile@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F77B12EC48 for <mile@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Aug 2017 14:08:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VzdbMk3NhevS for <mile@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Aug 2017 14:08:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-x233.google.com (mail-io0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 931B0129B62 for <mile@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Aug 2017 14:08:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io0-x233.google.com with SMTP id c74so11579290iod.4 for <mile@ietf.org>; Thu, 03 Aug 2017 14:08:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=nPw22cKaZFUSHtvGJVix2coAmOaTCy1H4Hbgw4BVgRs=; b=JYxtwlxZZgl7Up33vwdrM2NpMzC3RVRYUF4cTxo6Heex0o+bzpstsw97Twt7o8tUPd MvorMy4ssOR2yoPOUWmJT72MWF+V6tFaLhWMZUbToJYXXuKuTXm2Yi+rqBdrJ5CvqRuR wg89ffq9bY54hoBcg3hCyjc7XzYILlEp03NE1b+U6+XjFC+w3YlXRXswPAq9i5wpT1ea WPNAy40PvoA5sW2A9t4S4q4k6uGI/KhVgDVGJdgdAMNqqWhS39Q1ALPeOUkRAyWUhqd1 VUaJxcXFxZMSDp49vPg1GDVnOg9PXcsKwqyshUrzvlKpS268zAlvWoiCs6OISvWOdWfc /X1Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=nPw22cKaZFUSHtvGJVix2coAmOaTCy1H4Hbgw4BVgRs=; b=p+DIsFY8YnEcku+NwtvwIZtYHBa8xmYX2G2StmGQiycMIzyrtgNas/V/0K7NbEFYc+ /G3zIv+8BmIvdv6U+zFAZjr+E505JcXjJQ0ZO+9I+Oucw3VqjH6o4pYo+W1UGOYONBgi mQyilYundrfaXpodfQFA/egmkczYnQSzXkQ73G8zyQVXiGRjgZnZj0gDtvjZkqVcOMov 28PPtGr5Wihf3yDhRkvdebiQ7/cyhUAb+3T1qAZDaJ9akRuUES7ejZdks3McTs0J8nRr He6AXObAWXuVed2i+Haz69XvN6aG/5m+Gl6QOvimJZLWUyoFDPiRPmtlA3+Jttz3i4MI 9QOw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5iJlF1CXvY+mhPonDS3oI2+NkzmbLKWYypzgC93WKJmyP2lDWDC n9U8LV+kkKhT0oDHckINMO8pih+kFA==
X-Received: by 10.107.183.17 with SMTP id h17mr214369iof.188.1501794501875; Thu, 03 Aug 2017 14:08:21 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <C5A1DE61-B7D0-4238-ADF9-7AE825FA32FB@cisco.com> <7933b1e60e344c6db7dceda93b357fe3@XCH-ALN-010.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <7933b1e60e344c6db7dceda93b357fe3@XCH-ALN-010.cisco.com>
From: Adam Montville <adam.w.montville@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2017 21:08:10 +0000
Message-ID: <CACknUNV68pxREU5s291nMbwSh3Mx1=oNeZxof1f7cW-PyZF=qg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Panos Kampanakis (pkampana)" <pkampana@cisco.com>, "Nancy Cam-Winget (ncamwing)" <ncamwing@cisco.com>, "mile@ietf.org" <mile@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c0b77becf5d550555dfc721"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mile/IuimwFCty-cAHs8iSNifdgPRcts>
Subject: Re: [mile] ROLIE for Standards track?
X-BeenThere: mile@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Managed Incident Lightweight Exchange, IODEF extensions and RID exchanges" <mile.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mile>, <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mile/>
List-Post: <mailto:mile@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mile>, <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2017 21:08:24 -0000
+1 here also. On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 3:55 PM Panos Kampanakis (pkampana) < pkampana@cisco.com> wrote: > +1 for standards track. > > > > *From:* mile [mailto:mile-bounces@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *Nancy > Cam-Winget (ncamwing) > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 02, 2017 8:10 PM > *To:* mile@ietf.org > *Subject:* [mile] ROLIE for Standards track? > > > > Hi, > > > > Back in IETF 97 (Seoul), we discussed moving ROLIE from Informational to > Standards track with participants being in favor. However, I was remiss in > confirming this over the mail list….SO, > > In order to move this forward as I think the draft is ready other than its > category. > > > > I’d like to ask the mail list: > > - Should MILE adopt > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mile-rolie/ as a Standards > track document? > > > > Please respond by August 16th so that we can move this item forward. > > > > Kind regards, Nancy > _______________________________________________ > mile mailing list > mile@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mile >
- [mile] ROLIE for Standards track? Nancy Cam-Winget (ncamwing)
- Re: [mile] ROLIE for Standards track? Panos Kampanakis (pkampana)
- Re: [mile] ROLIE for Standards track? Adam Montville
- Re: [mile] ROLIE for Standards track? John Field
- Re: [mile] ROLIE for Standards track? Takeshi Takahashi
- Re: [mile] ROLIE for Standards track? Nancy Cam-Winget (ncamwing)