Re: [mile] ROLIE for Standards track?
John Field <jfield@pivotal.io> Mon, 07 August 2017 16:20 UTC
Return-Path: <jfield@pivotal.io>
X-Original-To: mile@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mile@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FD8913202F for <mile@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Aug 2017 09:20:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pivotal-io.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xbL5kcdFiXH1 for <mile@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Aug 2017 09:20:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x22d.google.com (mail-oi0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01CB013246B for <mile@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Aug 2017 09:20:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id x3so8724327oia.1 for <mile@ietf.org>; Mon, 07 Aug 2017 09:20:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pivotal-io.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Rfjka6iXChq4F0yXlKC8OLaHEgmeoxPBb2GPhaW9onY=; b=x3nyQUzbP+TXjgSmFpyBfMJeDxC3R7OOeCUH0dTHVwy6Gzd8EwZl8NaarUjbNcIDUZ AkzOAziO6hivD0+2aDvYWI72ZwtDz1IeMFrCq+V6IDyAiEXWUOZA9wlqM1j3NdRp85EA Ze3u1rtqBAdPN3Yv4DpxxLm521DK652y/RBFHaP6HJketsbw+fr/q+KjEqoS8NnyZzFs F+BdcS8LGlAGYvcqwF6O/A3g5MKlO1Z7rZP19n0pnSil5S4Aojp+ijItB0/GXXvpTThs Q1aAEWJ8swOwe0p0oFkEC0YujOyg3o0ky/CJiiO65clH8t80o+m6rX4j+b+kjYsLUL0x edzw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Rfjka6iXChq4F0yXlKC8OLaHEgmeoxPBb2GPhaW9onY=; b=t1ytabaJyyp7ydb7yRRTUPWyVjQysms3fVU4gSnRO6MP8HhuuIbFYxyjA2N0ueJeR6 n/yff5WgFed8dZ5uDuIEv0majGPQ0s8FH2+/Lh7Z6+aUvAePFR54SxUfi4FiCjDwFy7l 8oVK97jiqrzjch55tpYc7BM/1E+lAgNg3hAcPRyf2roqZ3zsfG/ELldo4oYby/jFEXLg OwDD4y7IyL13uGcdWkR+jijKAkzu5PDrCB4R3pWhVYYqNbyfUYZantSBPETaau6Xcqhy JrDx9/uumqf0JghTCG0ojFE8KYSsxO1F0H7oUk+fxedYx/+TingQ++lRD1hN+xrDuIDR gpog==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5ioAAvPVcdvly5CMysLRnKAWUkG0Yb6N3RuugnKJmSJpccFh+0t iW6Y0BBr3cYNnziVDKSdz+n6gkUTxYB3
X-Received: by 10.202.236.209 with SMTP id k200mr848831oih.120.1502122802179; Mon, 07 Aug 2017 09:20:02 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.246.166 with HTTP; Mon, 7 Aug 2017 09:20:01 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CACknUNV68pxREU5s291nMbwSh3Mx1=oNeZxof1f7cW-PyZF=qg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <C5A1DE61-B7D0-4238-ADF9-7AE825FA32FB@cisco.com> <7933b1e60e344c6db7dceda93b357fe3@XCH-ALN-010.cisco.com> <CACknUNV68pxREU5s291nMbwSh3Mx1=oNeZxof1f7cW-PyZF=qg@mail.gmail.com>
From: John Field <jfield@pivotal.io>
Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2017 12:20:01 -0400
Message-ID: <CAC0wChEO9f6Ly_E0JqUNKPAvo9xxMi+2XUAHg5ktqjNYeM=gzg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Adam Montville <adam.w.montville@gmail.com>
Cc: "Panos Kampanakis (pkampana)" <pkampana@cisco.com>, "Nancy Cam-Winget (ncamwing)" <ncamwing@cisco.com>, "mile@ietf.org" <mile@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c18144088df205562c386b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mile/dU_BvC9nw5-S9CrjsECOwClmtRM>
Subject: Re: [mile] ROLIE for Standards track?
X-BeenThere: mile@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Managed Incident Lightweight Exchange, IODEF extensions and RID exchanges" <mile.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mile>, <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mile/>
List-Post: <mailto:mile@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mile>, <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2017 16:20:05 -0000
+1 Thanks, John On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 5:08 PM, Adam Montville <adam.w.montville@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 here also. > > On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 3:55 PM Panos Kampanakis (pkampana) < > pkampana@cisco.com> wrote: > >> +1 for standards track. >> >> >> >> *From:* mile [mailto:mile-bounces@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *Nancy >> Cam-Winget (ncamwing) >> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 02, 2017 8:10 PM >> *To:* mile@ietf.org >> *Subject:* [mile] ROLIE for Standards track? >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> Back in IETF 97 (Seoul), we discussed moving ROLIE from Informational to >> Standards track with participants being in favor. However, I was remiss in >> confirming this over the mail list….SO, >> >> In order to move this forward as I think the draft is ready other than >> its category. >> >> >> >> I’d like to ask the mail list: >> >> - Should MILE adopt https://datatracker.ietf.org/ >> doc/draft-ietf-mile-rolie/ as a Standards track document? >> >> >> >> Please respond by August 16th so that we can move this item forward. >> >> >> >> Kind regards, Nancy >> _______________________________________________ >> mile mailing list >> mile@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mile >> > > _______________________________________________ > mile mailing list > mile@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mile > > -- John P. Field | Security PM | Pivotal Direct: (908) 962-3394 | jfield@ <jfield@gopivotal.com>pivotal.io
- [mile] ROLIE for Standards track? Nancy Cam-Winget (ncamwing)
- Re: [mile] ROLIE for Standards track? Panos Kampanakis (pkampana)
- Re: [mile] ROLIE for Standards track? Adam Montville
- Re: [mile] ROLIE for Standards track? John Field
- Re: [mile] ROLIE for Standards track? Takeshi Takahashi
- Re: [mile] ROLIE for Standards track? Nancy Cam-Winget (ncamwing)