Re: [mile] MILE WG draft adoption for RFC6045-bis

<david.black@emc.com> Wed, 26 October 2011 14:03 UTC

Return-Path: <david.black@emc.com>
X-Original-To: mile@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mile@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6C6E21F8B33 for <mile@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 07:03:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.915
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.915 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.684, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RxmY6ShMOas4 for <mile@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 07:03:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mexforward.lss.emc.com (mexforward.lss.emc.com [128.222.32.20]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42CFA21F899D for <mile@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 07:03:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hop04-l1d11-si01.isus.emc.com (HOP04-L1D11-SI01.isus.emc.com [10.254.111.54]) by mexforward.lss.emc.com (Switch-3.4.3/Switch-3.4.3) with ESMTP id p9QE3nq7023786 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <mile@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 10:03:50 -0400
Received: from mailhub.lss.emc.com (mailhub.lss.emc.com [10.254.221.253]) by hop04-l1d11-si01.isus.emc.com (RSA Interceptor) for <mile@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 10:03:35 -0400
Received: from mxhub15.corp.emc.com (mxhub15.corp.emc.com [128.221.56.104]) by mailhub.lss.emc.com (Switch-3.4.3/Switch-3.4.3) with ESMTP id p9QE3Y6I020251 for <mile@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 10:03:34 -0400
Received: from mx14a.corp.emc.com ([169.254.1.78]) by mxhub15.corp.emc.com ([128.221.56.104]) with mapi; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 10:03:33 -0400
From: david.black@emc.com
To: kathleen.moriarty@emc.com, mile@ietf.org
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 10:03:31 -0400
Thread-Topic: MILE WG draft adoption for RFC6045-bis
Thread-Index: AcyTNeQy1EYhFA+ORpak2LvXdvj3awALb9RQACD0+NA=
Message-ID: <7C4DFCE962635144B8FAE8CA11D0BF1E058D0EF98C@MX14A.corp.emc.com>
References: <AE31510960917D478171C79369B660FA0E0939FE18@MX06A.corp.emc.com>
In-Reply-To: <AE31510960917D478171C79369B660FA0E0939FE18@MX06A.corp.emc.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-EMM-MHVC: 1
Subject: Re: [mile] MILE WG draft adoption for RFC6045-bis
X-BeenThere: mile@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Managed Incident Lightweight Exchange, IODEF extensions and RID exchanges" <mile.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mile>, <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mile>
List-Post: <mailto:mile@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mile>, <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 14:03:52 -0000

Congratulations on the formation of the WG!

The RFC6045-bis draft should be adopted by the mile WG; the draft contains some important improvements over RFC 6045.

I've already reviewed the draft, and would be willing to take another look ... as my time availability permits ;-).

Thanks,
--David
----------------------------------------------------
David L. Black, Distinguished Engineer
EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA  01748
+1 (508) 293-7953             FAX: +1 (508) 293-7786
david.black@emc.com        Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754
----------------------------------------------------

> -----Original Message-----
> From: mile-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mile-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of kathleen.moriarty@emc.com
> Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2011 6:26 PM
> To: mile@ietf.org
> Subject: [mile] MILE WG draft adoption for RFC6045-bis
> 
> Hello,
> 
> Thank you all for your hard work in helping to move us to a WG status!  The next step is to ask for
> adoption of drafts.
> 
> The first document in which I would like to request working group adoption is RFC6045-bis with my hat
> on as editor of the document.  Please respond to the mailing list within a week (Nov 2nd) stating if
> you support RFC6045-bis adoption by the working group.  Also, please include if you are willing to
> review the draft in your response on adoption.
> 
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-moriarty-mile-rfc6045-bis-01
> 
> A consensus call will follow from Brian Trammell as Working Group chair.
> 
> Thank you!
> Kathleen
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: IESG Secretary [mailto:iesg-secretary@ietf.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2011 12:46 PM
> To: IETF Announcement list
> Cc: Moriarty, Kathleen; trammell@tik.ee.ethz.ch; mile@ietf.org
> Subject: WG Action: Managed Incident Lightweight Exchange (mile)
> 
> A new IETF working group has been formed in the Security Area.  For
> additional information, please contact the Area Directors or the WG
> Chairs.
> 
> Managed Incident Lightweight Exchange (mile)
> --------------------------------------------
> Status: Proposed Working Group Charter
> Last Updated: 2011-09-21
> 
> Chairs:
>      Kathleen Moriarty <Kathleen.Moriarty@emc.com>
>      Brian Trammell <trammell@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
> 
> Security Area Directors:
>      Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
>      Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com>
> 
> Security Area Advisor:
>      Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com>
> 
> Mailing Lists:
>      General Discussion: mile@ietf.org
>      To Subscribe:       http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mile
>      Archive:            http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mile
> 
> Description:
> 
> The Managed Incident Lightweight Exchange (MILE) working group will
> develop standards and extensions for the purpose of improving incident
> information sharing and handling capabilities based on the work
> developed in the IETF Extended INCident Handling (INCH) working group.
> The Incident Object Description Exchange Format (IODEF) in RFC5070 and
> Real-time Inter-network Defense (RID) in RFC6045 were developed in the
> INCH working group by international Computer Security Incident Response
> Teams (CSIRTs) and industry to meet the needs of a global community
> interested in sharing, handling, and exchanging incident information.
> The extensions and guidance created by the MILE working group assists
> with the daily operations of CSIRTs at an organization, service
> provider, law enforcement, and at the country level.  The application of
> IODEF and RID to interdomain incident information cooperative exchange
> and sharing has recently expanded and the need for extensions has become
> more important. Efforts continue to deploy IODEF and RID, as well as to
> extend them to support specific use cases covering reporting and
> mitigation of current threats such as anti-phishing extensions.
> 
> An incident could be a benign configuration issue, IT incident, an
> infraction to a service level agreement (SLA), a system compromise,
> socially engineered phishing attack, or a denial-of-service (DoS)
> attack, etc.  When an incident is detected, the response may include
> simply filing a report, notification to the source of the incident, a
> request to a third party for resolution/mitigation, or a request to
> locate the source.  IODEF defines a data representation that provides a
> standard format for sharing information commonly exchanged about
> computer security incidents.  RID enables the secure exchange of
> incident related information in an IODEF format providing options for
> security, privacy, and policy setting.
> 
> MILE leverages collaboration and sharing experiences with the work
> developed in the INCH working group which includes the data model
> detailed in the IODEF, existing extensions to the IODEF for
> Anti-phishing (RFC5901), and RID (RFC6045, RFC6046) for the secure
> exchange of information.  MILE will also leverage the experience gained
> in using IODEF and RID in operational contexts. Related work, drafted
> outside of INCH will also be reviewed and includes RFC5941, Sharing
> Transaction Fraud Data.
> 
> The MILE working group provides coordination for these various extension
> efforts to improve the capabilities for exchanging incident information.
>   MILE has several objectives with the first being a description a
> subset of IODEF focused on ease of deployment and applicability to
> current information security data sharing use cases.  MILE also
> describes a generalization of RID for secure exchange of other
> security-relevant XML formats.  MILE produces additional guidance needed
> for the successful exchange of incident information for new use cases
> according to policy, security, and privacy requirements.  Finally, MILE
> produces a document template with guidance for defining IODEF extensions
> to be followed when producing extensions to IODEF as appropriate, for:
> 
>   * labeling incident reports with data protection, data retention, and
>     other policies, regulations, and
>     laws restricting the handling of those reports
>   * referencing structured security information from within incident
>     reports
>   * reporting forensic data generated during an incident investigation
>     (computer or accounting)
> 
> The WG will produce the following:
> 
>   * An informational document on IODEF Guidance.
>   * A Standards Track document specifying the Real-time Inter-network
>     Defense (RID).
>   * A Standards Track document specifying the transport for RID.
>   * An informational template for extensions to IODEF.
>   * A Standards Track document for IODEF Extensions in IANA XML Registry.
>   * A Standards Track document for IODEF Extension to support
>     structured cybersecurity information.
>   * A Standards Track document for Labeling for data protection,
>     retention, policies, and regulations.
>   * A Standards Track document for GRC Report Exchange.
>   * A Standards Track document for IODEF Extension to support forensics.
> 
> The drafts under consideration as WG items include:
>    * Real-time Inter-network Defense (RID) bis:
>       draft-moriarty-mile-rfc6045-bis-01
>    * Transport of Real-time Inter-network Defense (RID) Messages bis:
>       draft-trammell-mile-rfc6046-bis-00
>    * Template for extensions to IODEF:
>       draft-trammell-mile-template-01.txt
>    * IODEF Extensions in IANA XML Registry:
>       draft-trammell-mile-iodef-xmlreg-00.txt
>    * GRC Report Exchange (Generalized RID for XML reports/documents):
>       draft-moriarty-mile-grc-exchange-00.txt
>    * IODEF-extension to support structured cybersecurity information:
>       draft-takahashi-mile-sci-00.txt
> 
> Milestones
> 
> WGLC = Working Group Last Call
> 
> 2011-11 - WGLC Real-time Inter-network Defense (RID)
> 2011-11 - WGLC Transport for Real-time Inter-network Defense (RID)
> 2011-12 - Submit Real-time Inter-network Defense (RID) to IESG for
>            consideration as Standards Track document
> 2011-12 - Submit Transport Real-time Inter-network Defense (RID) to
>            IESG for consideration as Standards Track document
> 2011-12 - WGLC Template for extensions to IODEF
> 2011-12 - WGLC IODEF Extensions in IANA XML Registry
> 2011-12 - WGLC IODEF Extension to support structured cybersecurity
>            information
> 2012-02 - Submit Template for extensions to IODEF to IESG for
>            consideration as Informational document
> 2012-02 - Submit IODEF Extensions in IANA XML Registry to IESG for
>            consideration as Standards Track document
> 2012-02 - Submit IODEF Extension to support structured cybersecurity
>            information to IESG for consideration as Standards Track
>            document
> 2012-03 - WGLC IODEF Extension Labeling for data protection, retention,
>            policies, and regulations
> 2012-03 - WGLC IODEF Guidance
> 2012-04 - Submit IODEF Extension Labeling for data protection,
>            retention, policies, and regulations to IESG for
>            consideration as Standards Track document
> 2012-04 - Submit WGLC IODEF Guidance to IESG for consideration as
>            Informational document
> 2012-05 - WGLC GRC Report Exchange
> 2012-06 - Submit GRC Report Exchange to IESG for consideration as
>            Standards Track document
> 2012-06 - WGLC Forensics extension
> 2012-07 - Submit IODEF Forensics extension to IESG for consideration as
>            Standards Track document
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mile mailing list
> mile@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mile