[mile] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6545 (3939)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Sat, 29 March 2014 17:42 UTC

To: Kathleen.Moriarty@emc.com, stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie, Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com, alexey.melnikov@isode.com, takeshi_takahashi@nict.go.jp
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20140329174220.94B987FC17B@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 10:42:20 -0700
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mile/j2opiyOAdmI9Bij62dCw4APYVy4
Cc: mile@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [mile] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6545 (3939)
Precedence: list

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6545,
"Real-time Inter-network Defense (RID)".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6545&eid=3939

--------------------------------------
Type: Technical
Reported by: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>

Section: 7.1.1

Original Text
-------------
      <iodef-rid:XMLDocument dtype="xml" meaning="xml">
       <IODEF-Document lang="en">
        <iodef:Incident purpose="traceback" restriction="need-to-know">
          <iodef:IncidentID name="CERT-FOR-OUR-DOMAIN">
                           CERT-FOR-OUR-DOMAIN#207-1
          </iodef:IncidentID>


Corrected Text
--------------
      <iodef-rid:XMLDocument dtype="xml" meaning="xml">
       <iodef:IODEF-Document lang="en">
        <iodef:Incident purpose="traceback" restriction="need-to-know">
          <iodef:IncidentID name="CERT-FOR-OUR-DOMAIN">
                           CERT-FOR-OUR-DOMAIN#207-1
          </iodef:IncidentID>


Notes
-----
The IODEF-Document node (both opening and closing) are missing the namespace prefix.  Without this, the contents of the node will not be correctly validated.

(Change is in line 2 above.  The closing tag change is the same, but is not part of the delta change above.)

Instructions:
-------------
This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC6545 (draft-ietf-mile-rfc6045-bis-11)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Real-time Inter-network Defense (RID)
Publication Date    : April 2012
Author(s)           : K. Moriarty
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Managed Incident Lightweight Exchange
Area                : Security
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG

[mile] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6545 (3939) RFC Errata System
Re: [mile] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6545 (3… Moriarty, Kathleen
[mile] FW: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6545 (3… Takeshi Takahashi
[mile] [Errata Verified] RFC6545 (3939) RFC Errata System