[mile] FW: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6545 (3939)

["Takeshi Takahashi" <[e-mail]>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Moriarty, Kathleen [mailto:[e-mail]]
> Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 10:55 PM
> To: RFC Errata System; [e-mail];
> [e-mail]; [e-mail];
> [e-mail]
> Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> Subject: RE: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6545 (3939)
> 
> This one is simple and a good catch.
> 
> Thank you, Jim!
> 
> Best regards,
> Kathleen
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: RFC Errata System [mailto:[e-mail]]
> Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2014 1:42 PM
> To: Moriarty, Kathleen; [e-mail];
> [e-mail]; [e-mail];
> [e-mail]
> Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> Subject: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6545 (3939)
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6545, "Real-time
> Inter-network Defense (RID)".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6545&eid=3939
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Jim Schaad <[e-mail]>
> 
> Section: 7.1.1
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
>       <iodef-rid:XMLDocument dtype="xml" meaning="xml">
>        <IODEF-Document lang="en">
>         <iodef:Incident purpose="traceback" restriction="need-to-know">
>           <iodef:IncidentID name="CERT-FOR-OUR-DOMAIN">
>                            CERT-FOR-OUR-DOMAIN#207-1
>           </iodef:IncidentID>
> 
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>       <iodef-rid:XMLDocument dtype="xml" meaning="xml">
>        <iodef:IODEF-Document lang="en">
>         <iodef:Incident purpose="traceback" restriction="need-to-know">
>           <iodef:IncidentID name="CERT-FOR-OUR-DOMAIN">
>                            CERT-FOR-OUR-DOMAIN#207-1
>           </iodef:IncidentID>
> 
> 
> Notes
> -----
> The IODEF-Document node (both opening and closing) are missing the
namespace
> prefix.  Without this, the contents of the node will not be correctly
> validated.
> 
> (Change is in line 2 above.  The closing tag change is the same, but is
> not part of the delta change above.)
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use
> "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a
> decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the
> status and edit the report, if necessary.
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC6545 (draft-ietf-mile-rfc6045-bis-11)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Real-time Inter-network Defense (RID)
> Publication Date    : April 2012
> Author(s)           : K. Moriarty
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Managed Incident Lightweight Exchange
> Area                : Security
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG