Re: [Mip4] Differences between Low Latency Handovers and FMIPv4

Hello Qiang,

On 2005-03-18 9:05 pm Qiang Zhang/Aber said the following:

>>From an implementor point of view, since there is already a llh draft in
> experimental standard,  it will be interesting to debate on the technical
> pros/cons between, or if they are having a lot similarity, can those be
> combined?

The lowlatency draft is just waiting for a reference; we will not pull
it back to consider combination.  If after some time out in the wide
world, we find that some intersection of these two drafts seem ripe for
standardization, I think it would be best to start fresh on that effort.

I should have made the point clear in an earlier note, but I expect
the fmipv4 draft, if adopted as a WG item, to also be intended for
publication as an experimental RFC.

Jak's experimental data regarding a lowlatency and a fmipv4-like
implementation is an interesting step on the road to formulating a
proposed standard in this area, but I believe some more experience
with both would be good before taking the next step.

	Henrik

> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mobileip-lowlatency-handoffs-v4-09.txt
> 
> and
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-koodli-fmipv4-00.txt
> 

-- 
Mip4 mailing list: Mip4@ietf.org
    Web interface: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip4
     Charter page: http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/mip4-charter.html
Supplemental site: http://www.mip4.org/