Status of Regional MIPv4 (Re: [Mip4] WG Action: RECHARTER: Mobility for IPv4 (mip4))
"Seok J. Koh" <sjkoh@pec.etri.re.kr> Thu, 09 October 2003 01:01 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA17636 for <mip4-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Oct 2003 21:01:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1A7PAs-0005c2-Tv for mip4-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 08 Oct 2003 21:01:03 -0400
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id h99112St021574 for mip4-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 8 Oct 2003 21:01:02 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1A7PAs-0005bt-Qb for mip4-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Wed, 08 Oct 2003 21:01:02 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA17610 for <mip4-web-archive@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Oct 2003 21:00:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1A7PAq-0006u8-00 for mip4-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 08 Oct 2003 21:01:00 -0400
Received: from ietf.org ([132.151.1.19] helo=optimus.ietf.org) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1A7PAp-0006u5-00 for mip4-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 08 Oct 2003 21:00:59 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1A7PAr-0005az-1g; Wed, 08 Oct 2003 21:01:01 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1A7P9v-0005YV-IT for mip4@optimus.ietf.org; Wed, 08 Oct 2003 21:00:03 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA17589 for <mip4@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Oct 2003 20:59:54 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1A7P9s-0006tw-00 for mip4@ietf.org; Wed, 08 Oct 2003 21:00:00 -0400
Received: from pec.etri.re.kr ([129.254.114.50]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1A7P9s-0006tX-00 for mip4@ietf.org; Wed, 08 Oct 2003 21:00:00 -0400
Received: from LocalHost (sjkoh.etri.re.kr [129.254.112.15]) by pec.etri.re.kr (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id h991E0U3026734 for <mip4@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Oct 2003 10:14:00 +0900 (KST)
Message-ID: <00c101c38e00$96d17740$0f70fe81@LocalHost>
From: "Seok J. Koh" <sjkoh@pec.etri.re.kr>
To: mip4@ietf.org
References: <200310081542.LAA23584@ietf.org>
Subject: Status of Regional MIPv4 (Re: [Mip4] WG Action: RECHARTER: Mobility for IPv4 (mip4))
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2003 09:59:27 +0900
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: mip4-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: mip4-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: mip4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip4>, <mailto:mip4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Mobility for IPv4 <mip4.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:mip4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mip4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip4>, <mailto:mip4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Dear all, In the MIP4 WG charter, I cannot see the item "Regional Registration (draft-ietf-mobileip-reg-tunnel-07.txt)". Is it determined that the regional MIPv4 issue will not be considered as a work item ? Sorry for not following the WG discussion on that. Seok J. Koh ----- Original Message ----- From: "The IESG" <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> To: <IETF-Announce:> Cc: "Henrik Levkowetz" <henrik@levkowetz.com>; "Pete McCann" <mccap@lucent.com>; <mip4@ietf.org> Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 12:42 AM Subject: [Mip4] WG Action: RECHARTER: Mobility for IPv4 (mip4) > The charter of the Mobility for IPv4 (mip4) working group in the > Internet Area of the IETF has been updated. For additional information, > please contact the Area Directors or the working group Chairs. > > Note: the only substantative change to this charter relative to the > existing charter is the addition of the following item: > > > 7. Experimental message types and extensions for Mobile IPv4 in > > accordance with draft-narten-iana-experimental-allocations-03.txt > > have been proposed in > > draft-patel-mobileip-experimental-messages-01.txt. The work group > > will take on and complete this specification. > > > Mobility for IPv4 (mip4) > ------------------------ > > Current Status: Active Working Group > > Chair(s): > > Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com> > Pete McCann <mccap@lucent.com> > > Internet Area Director(s): > > Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com> > Margaret Wasserman <margaret.wasserman@nokia.com> > > Mailing list: mip4@ietf.org > To Subscribe: mip4-request@ietf.org > In Body or Subject: subscribe > Archive: https://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/working-groups/mip4/current/ > > DESCRIPTION: > > IP mobility support for IPv4 nodes (hosts and routers) is specified in > RFC3344. RFC 3344 mobility allows a node to continue using its > "permanent" home address as it moves around the internet. The Mobile IP > protocols support transparency above the IP layer, including maintenance > of active TCP connections and UDP port bindings. Besides the basic > Mobile IPv4 (MIPv4) protocols, several other drafts deal with concerns > such as optimization, security, extensions, AAA support, and deployment > issues. > > Mobile IPv4 is currently being deployed on a wide basis (e.g., in > cdma2000 networks). The scope of the deployment is on a fairly large > scale and accordingly, the MIP4 WG will focus on deployment issues and > on addressing known deficiencies and shortcomings in the protocol that > have come up as a result of deployment experience. Specifically, the > working group will complete the work items to facilitate interactions > with AAA environments, interactions with enterprise environments when > Mobile IPv4 is used therein, and updating existing protocol > specifications in accordance with deployment needs and advancing those > protocols that are on the standards track. > > Work expected to be done by the MIP4 WG as proposed by this charter is > as follows: > > 1. MIPv4 has been a proposed standard for several years. It has been > adopted by other standard development organizations and has been > deployed commercially. One of the next steps for the WG is to advance > the protocol to draft standard status. As part of advancing base > Mobile IP specs to DS, the Mobile IPv4 NAI RFC (2794) will also be > progressed towards DS. > > 2. Key exchange using AAA infrastructures for setting up security > associations defined in RFC3344 will be completed. > > 3. The AAA WG, which is currently dealing with the Diameter Mobile IP > application, requires the AAA NAI for Mobile IPv4. This work will > be completed by the WG. The MIP4 WG will also work with the AAA WG > to ensure that the Diameter Mobile IP application is aligned with > WG requirements. > > 4. Home agent assignment at the time of mobile-ip registration, rather > than preconfigured for the mobile node, has been proposed in > draft-kulkarni-mobileip-dynamic-assignment-01.txt. The WG will > take on the task of completing this. The ability to switch the home > agent assigned to a mobile node while registered will also be > considered as part of this task. > > 5. Work items that are pending from the previous Mobile IP WG, which will be > completed by the MIP4 WG, are RFC3012bis (Challenge-response mechanism), > low-latency handover draft to experimental status and the completion > of the MIB for the revised base Mobile IP specification (2006bis). > > 6. The MIP4 WG will also complete the work on Mobile IPv4 interactions > in VPN scenarios. This work will involve identifying the requirements > and a solution development for Mobile IPv4 operation in the presence > of IPsec VPN's. > > 7. Experimental message types and extensions for Mobile IPv4 in accordance > with draft-narten-iana-experimental-allocations-03.txt has been > proposed in draft-patel-mobileip-experimental-messages-01.txt. > The work group will take on and complete this specification. > > Other potential work items may be identified in the future but will > require an appropriate recharter. > > Goals and Milestones: > > Aug 03 AAA Keys for MIPv4 to IESG > Sep 03 MIPv4 VPN interaction problem statement to IESG > Sep 03 Low latency handover to experimental > Oct 03 Revised MIPv4 Challenge/Response (3012bis) to IESG > Oct 03 Advance RFC 2794 (NAI Extension specification) to IESG for Draft > Standard > Nov 03 Revised MIB for MIPv4 to IESG > Dec 03 Revised MIPv4 specification to IESG for Draft Standard > Jan 04 Dynamic Home Agent assignment protocol solution to IESG > Jan 04 MIPv4 experimental extensions and message draft to IESG > Feb 04 MIPv4 VPN Solution to IESG > > > > -- > Mip4 mailing list > Mip4@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip4 > -- Mip4 mailing list Mip4@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip4
- [Mip4] WG Action: RECHARTER: Mobility for IPv4 (m… The IESG
- Status of Regional MIPv4 (Re: [Mip4] WG Action: R… Seok J. Koh
- Re: Status of Regional MIPv4 (Re: [Mip4] WG Actio… Henrik Levkowetz
- [Mip4] WG Action: RECHARTER: Mobility for IPv4 (m… The IESG
- [Mip4] WG Action: RECHARTER: Mobility for IPv4 (m… The IESG
- [Mip4] WG Action: RECHARTER: Mobility for IPv4 (m… IESG Secretary
- Re: [Mip4] WG Action: RECHARTER: Mobility for IPv… Pete McCann
- RE: [Mip4] WG Action: RECHARTER: Mobility for IPv… Kent Leung (kleung)
- RE: [Mip4] WG Action: RECHARTER: Mobility for IPv… Tsirtsis, George
- Re: [Mip4] WG Action: RECHARTER: Mobility for IPv… Pete McCann
- RE: [Mip4] WG Action: RECHARTER: Mobility for IPv… Tsirtsis, George
- Re: [Mip4] WG Action: RECHARTER: Mobility for IPv… Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [Mip4] WG Action: RECHARTER: Mobility for IPv… Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [Mip4] WG Action: RECHARTER: Mobility for IPv… Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: comments on draft-tsirtsis-v4v6-mipv4 (was: [… Alexandru Petrescu
- RE: comments on draft-tsirtsis-v4v6-mipv4 (was: [… Tsirtsis, George
- Re: comments on draft-tsirtsis-v4v6-mipv4 (was: [… Alexandru Petrescu
- RE: comments on draft-tsirtsis-v4v6-mipv4 (was: [… Tsirtsis, George
- Re: comments on draft-tsirtsis-v4v6-mipv4 (was: [… Alexandru Petrescu
- [Mip4] WG Action: RECHARTER: Mobility for IPv4 (m… IESG Secretary
- [Mip4] WG Action: RECHARTER: Mobility for IPv4 (m… IESG Secretary
- Re: [Mip4] WG Action: RECHARTER: Mobility for IPv… Sri Gundavelli
- Re: [Mip4] WG Action: RECHARTER: Mobility for IPv… Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [Mip4] WG Action: RECHARTER: Mobility for IPv… Alexandru Petrescu