Status of Regional MIPv4 (Re: [Mip4] WG Action: RECHARTER: Mobility for IPv4 (mip4))

"Seok J. Koh" <sjkoh@pec.etri.re.kr> Thu, 09 October 2003 01:01 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA17636 for <mip4-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Oct 2003 21:01:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1A7PAs-0005c2-Tv for mip4-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 08 Oct 2003 21:01:03 -0400
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id h99112St021574 for mip4-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 8 Oct 2003 21:01:02 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1A7PAs-0005bt-Qb for mip4-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Wed, 08 Oct 2003 21:01:02 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA17610 for <mip4-web-archive@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Oct 2003 21:00:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1A7PAq-0006u8-00 for mip4-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 08 Oct 2003 21:01:00 -0400
Received: from ietf.org ([132.151.1.19] helo=optimus.ietf.org) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1A7PAp-0006u5-00 for mip4-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 08 Oct 2003 21:00:59 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1A7PAr-0005az-1g; Wed, 08 Oct 2003 21:01:01 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1A7P9v-0005YV-IT for mip4@optimus.ietf.org; Wed, 08 Oct 2003 21:00:03 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA17589 for <mip4@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Oct 2003 20:59:54 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1A7P9s-0006tw-00 for mip4@ietf.org; Wed, 08 Oct 2003 21:00:00 -0400
Received: from pec.etri.re.kr ([129.254.114.50]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1A7P9s-0006tX-00 for mip4@ietf.org; Wed, 08 Oct 2003 21:00:00 -0400
Received: from LocalHost (sjkoh.etri.re.kr [129.254.112.15]) by pec.etri.re.kr (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id h991E0U3026734 for <mip4@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Oct 2003 10:14:00 +0900 (KST)
Message-ID: <00c101c38e00$96d17740$0f70fe81@LocalHost>
From: "Seok J. Koh" <sjkoh@pec.etri.re.kr>
To: mip4@ietf.org
References: <200310081542.LAA23584@ietf.org>
Subject: Status of Regional MIPv4 (Re: [Mip4] WG Action: RECHARTER: Mobility for IPv4 (mip4))
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2003 09:59:27 +0900
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: mip4-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: mip4-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: mip4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip4>, <mailto:mip4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Mobility for IPv4 <mip4.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:mip4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mip4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip4>, <mailto:mip4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Dear all,

In the MIP4 WG charter, I cannot see the item
"Regional Registration (draft-ietf-mobileip-reg-tunnel-07.txt)".

Is it determined that the regional MIPv4 issue 
will not be considered as a work item ?

Sorry for not following the WG discussion on that.

Seok J. Koh



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "The IESG" <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: <IETF-Announce:>
Cc: "Henrik Levkowetz" <henrik@levkowetz.com>; "Pete McCann" <mccap@lucent.com>; <mip4@ietf.org>
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 12:42 AM
Subject: [Mip4] WG Action: RECHARTER: Mobility for IPv4 (mip4)


> The charter of the Mobility for IPv4 (mip4) working group in the 
> Internet  Area of the IETF has been updated.  For additional information, 
> please contact the Area Directors or the working group Chairs.
> 
> Note: the only substantative change to this charter relative to the
> existing charter is the addition of the following item:
> 
> > 7. Experimental message types and extensions for Mobile IPv4 in
> > accordance with draft-narten-iana-experimental-allocations-03.txt
> > have been proposed in
> > draft-patel-mobileip-experimental-messages-01.txt. The work group
> > will take on and complete this specification.
> 
> 
>  Mobility for IPv4 (mip4)
>  ------------------------
> 
>  Current Status: Active Working Group
> 
>  Chair(s): 
> 
>        Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>
>        Pete McCann <mccap@lucent.com>
> 
>  Internet Area Director(s):
> 
>        Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>
>        Margaret Wasserman <margaret.wasserman@nokia.com>
> 
>        Mailing list: mip4@ietf.org
>        To Subscribe: mip4-request@ietf.org
>        In Body or Subject: subscribe
>        Archive: https://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/working-groups/mip4/current/
> 
>  DESCRIPTION:
> 
>    IP mobility support for IPv4 nodes (hosts and routers) is specified in
>    RFC3344. RFC 3344 mobility allows a node to continue using its
>    "permanent" home address as it moves around the internet. The Mobile IP
>    protocols support transparency above the IP layer, including maintenance
>    of active TCP connections and UDP port bindings. Besides the basic
>    Mobile IPv4 (MIPv4) protocols, several other drafts deal with concerns
>    such as optimization, security, extensions, AAA support, and deployment
>    issues. 
> 
>    Mobile IPv4 is currently being deployed on a wide basis (e.g., in
>    cdma2000 networks). The scope of the deployment is on a fairly large
>    scale and accordingly, the MIP4 WG will focus on deployment issues and
>    on addressing known deficiencies and shortcomings in the protocol that
>    have come up as a result of deployment experience. Specifically, the
>    working group will complete the work items to facilitate interactions
>    with AAA environments, interactions with enterprise environments when
>    Mobile IPv4 is used therein, and updating existing protocol
>    specifications in accordance with deployment needs and advancing those
>    protocols that are on the standards track.
> 
>    Work expected to be done by the MIP4 WG as proposed by this charter is
>    as follows:
> 
>    1. MIPv4 has been a proposed standard for several years. It has been
>       adopted by other standard development organizations and has been
>       deployed commercially. One of the next steps for the WG is to advance
>       the protocol to draft standard status. As part of advancing base
>       Mobile IP specs to DS, the Mobile IPv4 NAI RFC (2794) will also be
>       progressed towards DS.
> 
>    2. Key exchange using AAA infrastructures for setting up security
>       associations defined in RFC3344 will be completed.
> 
>    3. The AAA WG, which is currently dealing with the Diameter Mobile IP
>       application, requires the AAA NAI for Mobile IPv4. This work will
>       be completed by the WG. The MIP4 WG will also work with the AAA WG
>       to ensure that the Diameter Mobile IP application is aligned with
>       WG requirements.
> 
>    4. Home agent assignment at the time of mobile-ip registration, rather
>       than preconfigured for the mobile node, has been proposed in
>       draft-kulkarni-mobileip-dynamic-assignment-01.txt. The WG will
>       take on the task of completing this. The ability to switch the home
>       agent assigned to a mobile node while registered will also be
>       considered as part of this task. 
> 
>    5. Work items that are pending from the previous Mobile IP WG, which will be
>       completed by the MIP4 WG, are RFC3012bis (Challenge-response mechanism),
>       low-latency handover draft to experimental status and the completion
>       of the MIB for the revised base Mobile IP specification (2006bis).
> 
>    6. The MIP4 WG will also complete the work on Mobile IPv4 interactions
>       in VPN scenarios. This work will involve identifying the requirements
>       and a solution development for Mobile IPv4 operation in the presence
>       of IPsec VPN's. 
> 
>    7. Experimental message types and extensions for Mobile IPv4 in accordance 
>       with draft-narten-iana-experimental-allocations-03.txt has been
>       proposed in draft-patel-mobileip-experimental-messages-01.txt. 
>       The work group will take on and complete this specification.
> 
>    Other potential work items may be identified in the future but will
>    require an appropriate recharter.
> 
>    Goals and Milestones:
> 
>    Aug 03 AAA Keys for MIPv4 to IESG
>    Sep 03 MIPv4 VPN interaction problem statement to IESG
>    Sep 03 Low latency handover to experimental
>    Oct 03 Revised MIPv4 Challenge/Response (3012bis) to IESG
>    Oct 03 Advance RFC 2794 (NAI Extension specification) to IESG for Draft 
>           Standard
>    Nov 03 Revised MIB for MIPv4 to IESG
>    Dec 03 Revised MIPv4 specification to IESG for Draft Standard
>    Jan 04 Dynamic Home Agent assignment protocol solution to IESG
>    Jan 04 MIPv4 experimental extensions and message draft to IESG
>    Feb 04 MIPv4 VPN Solution to IESG
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Mip4 mailing list
> Mip4@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip4
> 

-- 
Mip4 mailing list
Mip4@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip4