[MEXT] MIP threats (Re: re-direction attack on MCoA)

Lakshminath Dondeti <ldondeti@qualcomm.com> Thu, 07 February 2008 22:27 UTC

Return-Path: <mext-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-mip6-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-mip6-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B9FC3A7C25; Thu, 7 Feb 2008 14:27:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.554
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.554 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.045, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from core3.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ClE5UkHYmxjb; Thu, 7 Feb 2008 14:27:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF88A3A7C2A; Thu, 7 Feb 2008 14:27:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: mext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AABFB3A7C29 for <mext@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Feb 2008 14:27:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from core3.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 26MV3nbDsIyz for <mext@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Feb 2008 14:27:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ithilien.qualcomm.com (ithilien.qualcomm.com [129.46.51.59]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA2EB3A7AD7 for <mext@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Feb 2008 14:26:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hamtaro.qualcomm.com (hamtaro.qualcomm.com [129.46.61.157]) by ithilien.qualcomm.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/1.0) with ESMTP id m17MRL0R016223 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 7 Feb 2008 14:27:21 -0800
Received: from [129.46.78.229] (dhcp-bldg-l7-78-7.qualcomm.com [129.46.78.229]) by hamtaro.qualcomm.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/1.0) with ESMTP id m17MRJoH015099 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 7 Feb 2008 14:27:20 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <47AB85C3.7060408@qualcomm.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 14:27:15 -0800
From: Lakshminath Dondeti <ldondeti@qualcomm.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: George Tsirtsis <tsirtsis@googlemail.com>
References: <7892795E1A87F04CADFCCF41FADD00FC051C02A0@xmb-ams-337.emea.cisco.com> <4C47BAA9-BA58-45F7-BDCF-2C050118BACE@it.uc3m.es> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0801301915130.30941@rhea.tcs.hut.fi> <F9F7F253-DC2E-4F89-B235-6C00A981425B@it.uc3m.es> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0801302010130.30941@rhea.tcs.hut.fi> <E4A82F11-1FA6-4908-A466-EC839FD7C315@it.uc3m.es> <6D19CA8D71C89C43A057926FE0D4ADAA232B6D@ecamlmw720.eamcs.ericsson.se> <d3886a520801310308u937f976u214dff17a050d97b@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <d3886a520801310308u937f976u214dff17a050d97b@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Charles Clancy <clancy@cs.umd.edu>, Christian Vogt <christian.vogt@ericsson.com>, Julien Laganier <julien.laganier@laposte.net>, mext@ietf.org
Subject: [MEXT] MIP threats (Re: re-direction attack on MCoA)
X-BeenThere: mext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile IPv6 EXTensions WG <mext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/mext>
List-Post: <mailto:mext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: mext-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: mext-bounces@ietf.org

Hi Suresh, George, all,

Please see
draft-vidya-ip-mobility-threats-01
draft-vidya-ip-mobility-sec-reqs-01

Christian, Charles, Vidya and I have been working on the same topic and 
wrote those documents (we hope to prepare an update before the next 
meeting).  Perhaps these could be a starting point?

regards,
Lakshminath

On 1/31/2008 3:08 AM, George Tsirtsis wrote:
> I am of course also interested in this work. I guess we already have
> enough people to get the ball rolling on this.
> 
> Thanks
> George
> 
> On Jan 31, 2008 10:59 AM, Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com> wrote:
>> Hi Marcelo,
>>   I am willing to work on a generic MIPv6 threats document along with the other interested people.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Suresh
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: marcelo bagnulo braun [mailto:marcelo@it.uc3m.es]
>> Sent: January 31, 2008 11:13 AM
>> To: Wassim Haddad
>> Cc: Julien Laganier; mext@ietf.org
>>
>> Subject: Re: [MEXT] re-direction attack on MCoA
>>
>>
>> El 30/01/2008, a las 19:16, Wassim Haddad escribió:
>>> => As there is a clear interest in the redirection attack on the HA
>>> side, I volunteer to do some work on this one.
>>>
>> I think the work should be general to all residual threats on MIP as
>> George mentioned, i think this would be more interesting since it
>> would allow us to put the different threats in perspective and figure
>> out which ones we should address.
>>
>>
>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Wassim H.
>>>
>>>
>>>> El 30/01/2008, a las 18:19, Wassim Haddad escribió:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Marcelo,
>>>>> IMHO, this topic has to be included as a new item in the new
>>>>> charter and
>>>>> should not be limited to MCoA.
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Wassim H.
>>>>> On Wed, 30 Jan 2008, marcelo bagnulo braun wrote:
>>>>>> Pascal,
>>>>>> The question at this point is the following one: do you think
>>>>>> that this threat should be addressed in the MCoA draft itself?
>>>>>> comments?
>>>>>> Regards, marcelo
>>>>>> El 30/01/2008, a las 10:09, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) escribió:
>>>>>>> I agree with Wassim on both mails.
>>>>>>> There's also the situation where the MN/MR might be fooled by the
>>>>>>> visited network into believing that the CoA (or its prefix if a
>>>>>>> network
>>>>>>> is attacked as opposed to a host) is on the visited link. DSMIP
>>>>>>> is also
>>>>>>> exposed, in particular with IPv4 CoAs.
>>>>>>> There are many scenarios that do not involve high mobility were
>>>>>>> a 3-way
>>>>>>> or a 4-way handshake could be used to verify the CoA. We have
>>>>>>> proposed
>>>>>>> such a test in section 6 of the RRH draft that uses a triggered
>>>>>>> 2nd BU
>>>>>>> flow to verify the CoA in the first one:
>>>>>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-thubert-nemo-reverse-routing-header-07#
>>>>>>> section-6
>>>>>>> Pascal
>>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>>> From: Wassim Haddad [mailto:whaddad@tcs.hut.fi]
>>>>>>>> Sent: mercredi 30 janvier 2008 09:32
>>>>>>>> To: Benjamin Lim
>>>>>>>> Cc: 'Julien Laganier'; mext@ietf.org
>>>>>>>> Subject: RE: [MEXT] re-direction attack on MCoA
>>>>>>>> On Wed, 30 Jan 2008, Benjamin Lim wrote:
>>>>>>>>> All in all, what I am trying to say is that tracing only
>>>>>>>>> limits the
>>>>>>>>> effect of the attack from escalating further and not
>>>>>>>>> preventing it.
>>>>>>>> => which (again) also perfectly applies to a single CoA.
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>> Wassim H.
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> MEXT mailing list
>>>>>>>> MEXT@ietf.org
>>>>>>>> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> MEXT mailing list
>>>>>>> MEXT@ietf.org
>>>>>>> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> MEXT mailing list
>>>>> MEXT@ietf.org
>>>>> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> MEXT mailing list
>>> MEXT@ietf.org
>>> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> MEXT mailing list
>> MEXT@ietf.org
>> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> MEXT mailing list
>> MEXT@ietf.org
>> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> MEXT mailing list
> MEXT@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
> 
_______________________________________________
MEXT mailing list
MEXT@ietf.org
http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext