Re: [Mip6] Next steps for I-D: draft-ietf-mip6-auth-protocol

Charlie -

I just did a grep on doc and we don't have a MUST that NAI and 
MHAE/MN-AAA AE
must go together. NAI "should" be used with the auth. option (not must).

Beyond that, can you list the issues? I can add them up on the issue 
tracker
(or maybe you can too) and we can track it there?

-a

Charlie P wrote:

>
> Hello Basvaraj,
>
> I am in favor of getting things done as quickly as possible,
> but I hope that we do not have to rush to completion so
> soon on this.  What are the driving factors for expediting
> the standardization of the protocol?
>
> For instance, I strongly disagree that authentication
> should mandate including the NAI.  I also wonder
> why there is any mandate to agree with anything
> in rfc3012bis, since that is a protocol specification
> concerned with IPv4.
>
> I think there could be a number of other issues
> about which discussion is needed.
>
> Regards,
> Charlie P.
>
>
>
> Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com wrote:
>
>> Next steps for I-D: draft-ietf-mip6-auth-protocol
>>
>> 1. Merge the NAI Option for MIP6 (specified in I-D:
>>   draft-ietf-mip6-nai-option) with the Auth protocol draft.   2. 
>> There were several people who suggested during the consensus call
>>   that they would like to see some changes to the current
>>   proposal. Please send the changes that you would like to see to the
>>   I-D by raising an issue. The issue list for MIP6 is at:
>>   http://www.mip4.org/issues/tracker/mip6/
>>
>> 3. We will issue a Working group last call as soon as the next
>>   revision of the I-D is published.
>>
>> -Basavaraj
>>   
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mip6 mailing list
>> Mip6@ietf.org
>> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip6
>>  
>>
>
>

_______________________________________________
Mip6 mailing list
Mip6@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip6