Re: [Mip6] Next steps for I-D: draft-ietf-mip6-auth-protocol

Hello Basvaraj,

I am in favor of getting things done as quickly as possible,
but I hope that we do not have to rush to completion so
soon on this.  What are the driving factors for expediting
the standardization of the protocol?

For instance, I strongly disagree that authentication
should mandate including the NAI.  I also wonder
why there is any mandate to agree with anything
in rfc3012bis, since that is a protocol specification
concerned with IPv4.

I think there could be a number of other issues
about which discussion is needed.

Regards,
Charlie P.

Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com wrote:

>Next steps for I-D: draft-ietf-mip6-auth-protocol
>
>1. Merge the NAI Option for MIP6 (specified in I-D:
>   draft-ietf-mip6-nai-option) with the Auth protocol draft. 
>   
>2. There were several people who suggested during the consensus call
>   that they would like to see some changes to the current
>   proposal. Please send the changes that you would like to see to the
>   I-D by raising an issue. The issue list for MIP6 is at:
>   http://www.mip4.org/issues/tracker/mip6/
>
>3. We will issue a Working group last call as soon as the next
>   revision of the I-D is published.
>
>-Basavaraj
>    
>
>_______________________________________________
>Mip6 mailing list
>Mip6@ietf.org
>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip6
>  
>

_______________________________________________
Mip6 mailing list
Mip6@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip6