Re: [Mip6] Draft agenda of MIP6 WG meeting at IETF61
Thierry Ernst <ernst@sfc.wide.ad.jp> Mon, 01 November 2004 08:21 UTC
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id DAA01997 for <mip6-web-archive@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Nov 2004 03:21:10 -0500 (EST)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1COXTb-0008VL-Ux for mip6-web-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 01 Nov 2004 03:23:44 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1COXBb-0000uq-U1; Mon, 01 Nov 2004 03:05:07 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1COX7d-0000bj-JT for mip6@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 01 Nov 2004 03:01:02 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id DAA03468 for <mip6@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Nov 2004 03:00:59 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mail.sfc.wide.ad.jp ([203.178.142.146]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1COXMU-0008OT-3h for mip6@ietf.org; Mon, 01 Nov 2004 03:16:22 -0500
Received: from iseran.local (net56-dhcp-234.sfc.keio.ac.jp [133.27.57.234]) by mail.sfc.wide.ad.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id C67584C069; Mon, 1 Nov 2004 17:00:28 +0900 (JST)
Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2004 17:03:05 +0900
From: Thierry Ernst <ernst@sfc.wide.ad.jp>
To: mip6@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Mip6] Draft agenda of MIP6 WG meeting at IETF61
Message-Id: <20041101170305.5737d2e4.ernst@sfc.wide.ad.jp>
In-Reply-To: <418211A9.4070102@clarinet.u-strasbg.fr>
References: <697DAA22C5004B4596E033803A7CEF4403B1C07E@daebe007.americas.nokia.com> <418211A9.4070102@clarinet.u-strasbg.fr>
Organization: Keio University
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; powerpc-apple-darwin7.4.0)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: b22590c27682ace61775ee7b453b40d3
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: koo@comnets.uni-bremen.de, Ryuji Wakikawa <ryuji@sfc.wide.ad.jp>, Nicolas Montavont <montavont@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr>, Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com
X-BeenThere: mip6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: mip6.ietf.org
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip6>, <mailto:mip6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:mip6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mip6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip6>, <mailto:mip6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: mip6-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: mip6-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: b1c41982e167b872076d0018e4e1dc3c
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Dear all, Of course, I second this. I would like to add that the ability to manage multiple interfaces is very important, particularly for mobile nodes. Now that the important work on the MIPv6 spec is behind us, I think it's the right time to bring the "multiple interfaces management" issue back on the table, before people implement non-compatible solutions. Note that the ability to manage multiple interfaces is probably the feature that would motivate the need for MIP6 (I cannot see the need to perform MIP6 between 2 WIFI hot-spots since the opportunity seldomly appear; however, I would definitely use MIP6 on a daily-base if I could switch between WIFI and 3G|AirH|B-mobile|GPRS. So, it's a good timing to question if the MIP6 working group wants to add this as a WG item. If yes, we need more thought on the problem statement and to discuss the potential interactions with the NEMO WG (cf draft-ietf-nemo-multihoming-issues). If not, we may seriously think about setting up a new WG, but I would rather leave it as a second option if the conclusion of the meeting is that MIP6 is not the right WG for it. We probably need a 10mins discussion in order to reach a conclusion (I don't think we need to discuss the motivations, the existing drafts do it already). Thierry. On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 11:47:21 +0200 Nicolas Montavont <montavont@clarinet.u-strasbg.fr> wrote: > Dear Basavaraj and folks, > > We just published a new version of our draft on Multihoming analysis in > MIPv6. You can find the new version at > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-montavont-mobileip-multihoming-pb-statement-02.txt > > This draft analyses the MIP6 behavior when a MN is multihomed and > classifies the different cases when a MN is multihomed. It completes the > generic draft > (http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ernst-generic-goals-and-benefits-00.txt) > which explains the goals and benefits we can expect from the multihoming > of host. > > It would be good to have feedback from the working group on this work. > > We would like to request a short slot to discuss the interest of the > Working Group on the multihoming. It is a long time that several drafts > deal with MIPv6 and multihoming. Our two drafts could be the starting > point to add a new item to the WG charter. These two drafts may define > the problem statement of MN multhoming. > > Once more, please don't hesitate to comment both the drafts and the > proposition to add a new item in the WG charter. > > Regards, > > Nicolas > > Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com wrote: > > ><Draft Agenda - 10/27> > > > >Time and Date of WG meeting at IETF61: TBD > >Duration: 2.5 hours > > > >Agenda > >====== > > > >1. Agenda, Bluesheets, Note-takers and Jabber scribes 5 Mins > > > >2. WG status update Chairs 10 Mins > > > >3. MIP6 Operation with IKEv2 and the revised IPsec Arch. 10 Mins > > I-D: draft-ietf-mip6-ikev2-ipsec-00.txt > > Vijay Devarapalli > > > > > >4. a. Using IPsec to protect signaling between MN and CN 5 Mins > > I-D: draft-dupont-mipv6-cn-ipsec-01.txt > > b. Care-of address test procedure using a state cookie 5 Mins > > I-D: Annex of draft-dupont-mipv6-cn-ipsec-01.txt > > Francis Dupont > > > >5. MIPv6 Authorization and Configuration based on EAP 10 Mins > > I-D: draft-giaretta-mip6-authorization-eap-02.txt > > Giaretta Gerardo > > > >6. Application Master Session Key (AMSK) for Mobile IPv6 5 Mins > > I-D: draft-giaretta-mip6-amsk-00.txt > > Giaretta Gerardo > > > >7. Goals for AAA-HA interface 10 Mins > > I-D: draft-giaretta-mip6-aaa-ha-goals-00.txt > > Giaretta Gerardo > > > >8. AAA Mobile IPv6 Application Framework 10 Mins > > I-D: draft-yegin-mip6-aaa-fwk-00.txt > > Alper Yegin > > > >9. Diameter Mobile IPv6 Bootstrapping Application using PANA 10 Mins > > I-D: draft-jee-mip6-bootstrap-pana-00.txt > > Junghoon Jee > > > >10. Mobile IPv6 Bootstrapping Architecture Using DHCP 15 Mins > > I-D: draft-ohba-mip6-boot-arch-dhcp-00 > > Yoshihiro Ohba > > > >11. Precomputable Binding Management Key Kbm for Mobile IPv6 5 Mins > > I-D: draft-ietf-mip6-precfgkbm-01.txt > > Charles Perkins > > > >12. Improvement of Return Routability Protocol 10 Mins > > I-D: draft-qiu-mip6-rr-improvement-00.txt > > Jianying ZHOU > > > > > >13. Next steps Chairs 5 Mins > > > >_______________________________________________ > >Mip6 mailing list > >Mip6@ietf.org > >https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip6 > > > > > _______________________________________________ Mip6 mailing list Mip6@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip6
- [Mip6] Draft agenda of MIP6 WG meeting at IETF61 Basavaraj.Patil
- Re: [Mip6] Draft agenda of MIP6 WG meeting at IET… Nicolas Montavont
- Re: [Mip6] Draft agenda of MIP6 WG meeting at IET… Thierry Ernst
- RE: [Mip6] Draft agenda of MIP6 WG meeting at IET… Koojana Kuladinithi