[Mipshop] Re: FMIPv6 Discuss

[Russ Housley <[e-mail]>]

Works for me.

Russ

At 05:49 PM 9/23/2004, Rajeev Koodli wrote:

>Hi Russ,
>
>please find my comments to your review of
>draft-ietf-mipshop-fast-mipv6-02.txt
>
>
>Discuss:
>
>   Several places, the document refers to AH in SHOULD and MUST
>statements,
>   yet there is no corresponding normative reference.
>
>Rajeev:> Will add.
>
>
>Comment:
>
>   The Security Considerations say:
>   :
>   : ... However, the future work, either as part of this document or in
>a
>   : separate document, may specify this security establishment.
>   :
>   Obviously, future work cannot be part of this document.  A subsequent
>   update to this document is possible.  Also, please change "security
>   establishment" to "security association establishment."
>
>Rajeev:> Would "However, future work may specify this security
>  association establishment" be okay?
>
>Thanks,
>
>-Rajeev


_______________________________________________
Mipshop mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mipshop