[Mipshop] FMIPv6 Discuss
Rajeev Koodli <rajeev@iprg.nokia.com> Thu, 23 September 2004 22:13 UTC
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA28581 for <mipshop-web-archive@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 18:13:16 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CAbww-0003VY-41 for mipshop-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 18:20:26 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CAbhp-0007rG-S4; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 18:04:49 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CAbSU-0002JM-LT for mipshop@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 17:48:58 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA26596 for <mipshop@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 17:48:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from darkstar.iprg.nokia.com ([205.226.5.69]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CAbZL-00034Q-W4 for mipshop@ietf.org; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 17:56:04 -0400
Received: (from root@localhost) by darkstar.iprg.nokia.com (8.11.0/8.11.0-DARKSTAR) id i8NLLWg04908; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 14:21:32 -0700
X-mProtect: <200409232121> Nokia Silicon Valley Messaging Protection
Received: from rajeev.iprg.nokia.com (205.226.2.90) by darkstar.iprg.nokia.com smtpdZzEUGO; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 14:21:30 PDT
Received: from iprg.nokia.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rajeev.iprg.nokia.com (8.9.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id OAA99163; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 14:49:17 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <415344DD.EE9C832A@iprg.nokia.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 14:49:17 -0700
From: Rajeev Koodli <rajeev@iprg.nokia.com>
Organization: Nokia Research Center
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 3.4-RELEASE i386)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: housley@vigilsec.com, gab@sun.com, mipshop@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 39bd8f8cbb76cae18b7e23f7cf6b2b9f
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Mipshop] FMIPv6 Discuss
X-BeenThere: mipshop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: rajeev@iprg.nokia.com
List-Id: mipshop.ietf.org
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mipshop>, <mailto:mipshop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:mipshop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mipshop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mipshop>, <mailto:mipshop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: mipshop-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: mipshop-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: a7d6aff76b15f3f56fcb94490e1052e4
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hi Russ, please find my comments to your review of draft-ietf-mipshop-fast-mipv6-02.txt Discuss: Several places, the document refers to AH in SHOULD and MUST statements, yet there is no corresponding normative reference. Rajeev:> Will add. Comment: The Security Considerations say: : : ... However, the future work, either as part of this document or in a : separate document, may specify this security establishment. : Obviously, future work cannot be part of this document. A subsequent update to this document is possible. Also, please change "security establishment" to "security association establishment." Rajeev:> Would "However, future work may specify this security association establishment" be okay? Thanks, -Rajeev _______________________________________________ Mipshop mailing list Mipshop@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mipshop
- [Mipshop] FMIPv6 Discuss Rajeev Koodli
- [Mipshop] Re: FMIPv6 Discuss Russ Housley