[Mipshop] Re: NAT Traversal for GIST (was GIST 802.21)
Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@motorola.com> Thu, 03 August 2006 20:06 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G8jSE-0002FR-Jp; Thu, 03 Aug 2006 16:06:02 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G8jSC-0002FE-Vj for mipshop@ietf.org; Thu, 03 Aug 2006 16:06:00 -0400
Received: from motgate8.mot.com ([129.188.136.8]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G8jSB-0002vR-OX for mipshop@ietf.org; Thu, 03 Aug 2006 16:06:00 -0400
Received: from il06exr02.mot.com (il06exr02.mot.com [129.188.137.132]) by motgate8.mot.com (8.12.11/Motorola) with ESMTP id k73K5xBi012607; Thu, 3 Aug 2006 13:05:59 -0700 (MST)
Received: from [10.169.5.8] (mvp-10-169-5-8.corp.mot.com [10.169.5.8]) by il06exr02.mot.com (8.13.1/8.13.0) with ESMTP id k73K5vbR027857; Thu, 3 Aug 2006 15:05:58 -0500 (CDT)
Message-ID: <44D25725.5080201@motorola.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2006 22:05:57 +0200
From: Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@motorola.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: john.loughney@nokia.com
References: <BAA65A575825454CBB0103267553FCCC39CC59@esebe199.NOE.Nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <BAA65A575825454CBB0103267553FCCC39CC59@esebe199.NOE.Nokia.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAQ=
X-White-List-Member: TRUE
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7655788c23eb79e336f5f8ba8bce7906
Cc: mipshop@ietf.org
Subject: [Mipshop] Re: NAT Traversal for GIST (was GIST 802.21)
X-BeenThere: mipshop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: mipshop.ietf.org
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mipshop>, <mailto:mipshop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:mipshop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mipshop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mipshop>, <mailto:mipshop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: mipshop-bounces@ietf.org
john.loughney@nokia.com wrote: > Hi all, > > As chair of NSIS, I'd be happy to help with any discussion of how GIST > could be used with 802.21. As Robert ran through in the meeting today, > there are 5+ independent implementations of GIST, including several open > source implementations (I can send links, if there is interest) & we > have had 2 interop events. > > We have been working on NAT traversal issues, and are looking at > documenting these issues (currently there is an individual submission on > this issue), There seem to be several draft-pashalidis-nsis-gist-legacynats-00.txt draft-werner-nsis-natfw-nslp-statemachine-03.txt draft-pashalidis-nsis-gist-legacynats-00 draft-ietf-nsis-nslp-natfw-12.txt which one? Alex _______________________________________________ Mipshop mailing list Mipshop@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mipshop
- RE: [Mipshop] GIST for 802.21 Hancock, Robert
- [Mipshop] GIST for 802.21 john.loughney
- RE: [Mipshop] GIST for 802.21 Rahman, Akbar
- Re: [Mipshop] GIST for 802.21 James Kempf
- RE: [Mipshop] GIST for 802.21 Rahman, Akbar
- Re: [Mipshop] GIST for 802.21 Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [Mipshop] GIST for 802.21 James Kempf
- RE: [Mipshop] GIST for 802.21 Michael.G.Williams
- RE: [Mipshop] GIST for 802.21 john.loughney
- RE: [Mipshop] GIST for 802.21 john.loughney
- RE: [Mipshop] GIST for 802.21 john.loughney
- RE: [Mipshop] GIST for 802.21 john.loughney
- RE: [Mipshop] GIST for 802.21 Junghoon Jee
- RE: [Mipshop] GIST for 802.21 Hancock, Robert
- Re: [Mipshop] GIST for 802.21 James Kempf
- Re: [Mipshop] GIST for 802.21 Yoshihiro Ohba
- RE: [Mipshop] GIST for 802.21 john.loughney
- RE: [Mipshop] GIST for 802.21 Rahman, Akbar
- RE: [Mipshop] GIST for 802.21 Roy, Radhika R.
- [Mipshop] Re: NAT Traversal for GIST (was GIST 80… Alexandru Petrescu
- RE: [Mipshop] GIST for 802.21 Alper Yegin
- RE: [Mipshop] GIST for 802.21 Robert Hancock
- RE: [Mipshop] Re: NAT Traversal for GIST (was GIS… Robert Hancock
- Re: [Mipshop] Re: NAT Traversal for GIST (was GIS… Yoshihiro Ohba
- [Mipshop] RE: NAT Traversal for GIST (was GIST 80… john.loughney
- RE: [Mipshop] GIST for 802.21 Rahman, Akbar
- RE: [Mipshop] GIST for 802.21 Michael.G.Williams
- RE: [Mipshop] GIST for 802.21 Rahman, Akbar
- RE: [Mipshop] GIST for 802.21 Hancock, Robert
- RE: [Mipshop] GIST for 802.21 Alper Yegin
- RE: [Mipshop] GIST for 802.21 Rahman, Akbar
- RE: [Mipshop] GIST for 802.21 Sam Xia
- Re: [Mipshop] GIST for 802.21 Yoshihiro Ohba
- RE: [Mipshop] GIST for 802.21 Hancock, Robert
- RE: [Mipshop] GIST for 802.21 Hepworth, Eleanor
- RE: [Mipshop] GIST for 802.21 Alper Yegin