Re: [Mipshop] comments about draft-yokota-mipshop-pfmipv6-00.txt

Hi all,
  A little bit of history about this draft:
- we published draft-xia-netlmm-mnagno-00 a while ago. Kuntal contacted me and said he was interested, he had an earlier draft, did he say he wanted to co-author?
-I discussed in Prag with Hide and Kuntal and we talked about writing the new version together.
-I even emailed xml file of draft-xia-netlmm-mnagno-00 to Hide.
-Frank and I worked on -01 version and at the end I contacted Kuntal and asked him if he wishes to comment and co-author.
-Kuntal declined.
-We went ahead and published draft-xia-netlmm-mnagno-01.
-To our surprise we saw draft-yokota-mipshop-pfmipv6-00.txt?

  Now a technical comment:
in reactive mode, draft-yokota-mipshop-pfmipv6-00.txt proposes to use Hi/Hack signaling. Firstly this is deviation from maximum reuse of FMIP. Secondly, if it were possible to use the same signaling in both modes, why did the base document 4068bis not come up with such a unified signaling?

Regards,

Behcet

----- Original Message ----
From: Frank Xia <xiayangsong@huawei.com>
To: mipshop@ietf.org
Sent: Monday, July 9, 2007 11:18:27 AM
Subject: [Mipshop] comments about draft-yokota-mipshop-pfmipv6-00.txt

Hi Hidetoshi 

IMHO, I think the main idea of this draft is the same 
as

http://tools.ietf.org/wg/netlmm/draft-xia-netlmm-fmip-mnagno-01.txt

"Great minds think alike"

BR

Frank
_______________________________________________
Mipshop mailing list
Mipshop@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mipshop