IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Mipshop] MIPSHOP Draft Agenda for IETF 67

Vijay Devarapalli <vijay.devarapalli@azairenet.com> Fri, 27 October 2006 18:29 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GdWSS-0002Xr-5g; Fri, 27 Oct 2006 14:29:32 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GdWRh-0002Jo-MO for mipshop@ietf.org; Fri, 27 Oct 2006 14:28:45 -0400
Received: from dsl092-223-006.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.92.223.6] helo=moe.corp.azairenet.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GdWRd-0006Xx-6Y for mipshop@ietf.org; Fri, 27 Oct 2006 14:28:45 -0400
Received: from [10.1.201.12] ([66.92.223.6]) by moe.corp.azairenet.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 27 Oct 2006 11:28:35 -0700
Message-ID: <45424FD3.7030101@azairenet.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 11:28:35 -0700
From: Vijay Devarapalli <vijay.devarapalli@azairenet.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Alper Yegin <alper.yegin@yegin.org>
Subject: Re: [Mipshop] MIPSHOP Draft Agenda for IETF 67
References: <0MKoyl-1GdVou11LP-0004UF@mrelay.perfora.net>
In-Reply-To: <0MKoyl-1GdVou11LP-0004UF@mrelay.perfora.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Oct 2006 18:28:35.0701 (UTC) FILETIME=[B6DF0250:01C6F9F5]
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 9182cfff02fae4f1b6e9349e01d62f32
Cc: mipshop@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: mipshop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: mipshop.ietf.org
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mipshop>, <mailto:mipshop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:mipshop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mipshop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mipshop>, <mailto:mipshop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: mipshop-bounces@ietf.org

Alper Yegin wrote:
>>>>     draft-kempf-mipshop-handover-key-00.txt
>>>>     draft-vidya-mipshop-handover-keys-aaa-03.txt
>>>>     draft-haddad-mipshop-hmipv6-security-06
>>> What's the status of these documents?
>> waiting for various reviews. when these documents
>> went through a consensus call to be adopted as
>> WG documents back in March/April, it was decided
>> they need to reviewed by the security directorate
>> and mobility directorate. we got some of the
>> reviews back.
> 
> So, are they on-track to be adopted now or not? 

they are. unless there are significant technical
issues.

> Now that there are other
> alternatives on the table, how does the WG want to deal with this?

the WG needs to be convinced that these alternatives
are better and have advantages over the drafts that
are being considered currently.

Vijay

_______________________________________________
Mipshop mailing list
Mipshop@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mipshop

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email