RE: [Mipshop] MIPSHOP Draft Agenda for IETF 67

"Alper Yegin" <alper.yegin@yegin.org> Sat, 28 October 2006 21:09 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GdvRC-0001Oh-Jr; Sat, 28 Oct 2006 17:09:54 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GdvRB-0001Oc-7D for mipshop@ietf.org; Sat, 28 Oct 2006 17:09:53 -0400
Received: from mout.perfora.net ([217.160.230.41]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GdvR9-0007dp-VY for mipshop@ietf.org; Sat, 28 Oct 2006 17:09:53 -0400
Received: from [81.214.49.165] (helo=IBM52A5038A94F) by mrelay.perfora.net (node=mrelayus1) with ESMTP (Nemesis), id 0MKp2t-1GdvQu1U8q-0003sy; Sat, 28 Oct 2006 17:09:41 -0400
From: Alper Yegin <alper.yegin@yegin.org>
To: 'Vijay Devarapalli' <vijay.devarapalli@azairenet.com>
Subject: RE: [Mipshop] MIPSHOP Draft Agenda for IETF 67
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 00:09:34 +0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510
In-Reply-To: <4543A750.3040206@azairenet.com>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962
thread-index: Acb6wuwyEvKcnG6+Qhuvg+V50fSSIwAEj9rg
Message-ID: <0MKp2t-1GdvQu1U8q-0003sy@mrelay.perfora.net>
X-Provags-ID: perfora.net abuse@perfora.net login:abf7a4bb310ea4dfc9b6841113e2970f
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 769a46790fb42fbb0b0cc700c82f7081
Cc: mipshop@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: mipshop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: mipshop.ietf.org
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mipshop>, <mailto:mipshop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:mipshop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mipshop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mipshop>, <mailto:mipshop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: mipshop-bounces@ietf.org

> from Gabriel's email on April 11 2006,
> 
> > The drafts whose adoption is pending a mobility directorate review are:
> >
> >    draft-ietf-mipshop-handover-keys-aaa-XX.txt
> >    based on  draft-vidya-mipshop-handover-keys-aaa-01.txt
> >
> >    draft-ietf-mipshop-handover-key-send-XX.txt
> >    based on draft-kempf-mobopts-handover-key-01.txt (currently expired)
> >
> >    draft-ietf-mipshop-cga-cba-XX.txt
> >    based on draft-arkko-mipshop-cga-cba-03.txt
> >
> > Again, we will request review of all the above by mobdir.
> 
> the reviews we have received so far haven't raised
> any significant technical concerns. with

Sorry, I couldn't find the mobility directorate reviews. Did I miss them?
Anyways, could you please send a reference to them?

Alper




> draft-vidya-mipshop-handover-keys-aaa-01.txt there
> was an issue raised of having to charter new work
> in the DIME and/or radext WGs.
> 
> let us know if you see any issues.
> 
> regarding draft-haddad-mipshop-hmipv6-security-06
> Stefano initiated a WG consensus call for adopting
> it as a WG document on July 17 2006. the result of
> the consensus call
> 
> > -       draft-haddad-mipshop-hmipv6-security-04 (now in rev. 06): there
> has been a lot of discussion on the draft, with considerable comments and
> objections raised. In light of the very strong opposition, the chairs
> require further input on the draft and have submitted a request for
> feedback from the mobility directorate and the security directorate. We're
> therefore delaying the decision on the adoption/non adoption.
> 
> Vijay
> 



_______________________________________________
Mipshop mailing list
Mipshop@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mipshop