[mmox] More LLIDL questions
"Hurliman, John" <john.hurliman@intel.com> Wed, 18 February 2009 20:40 UTC
Return-Path: <john.hurliman@intel.com>
X-Original-To: mmox@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmox@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B216728C1D3 for <mmox@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 12:40:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pCnXSQdUs3TC for <mmox@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 12:40:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [143.182.124.21]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 124443A69F9 for <mmox@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 12:40:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from azsmga001.ch.intel.com ([10.2.17.19]) by azsmga101.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 18 Feb 2009 12:40:13 -0800
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.38,230,1233561600"; d="scan'208";a="112002144"
Received: from rrsmsx601.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.31.0.151]) by azsmga001.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 18 Feb 2009 12:39:50 -0800
Received: from rrsmsx506.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.31.0.39]) by rrsmsx601.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.31.0.151]) with mapi; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 13:39:50 -0700
From: "Hurliman, John" <john.hurliman@intel.com>
To: "mmox@ietf.org" <mmox@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 13:39:43 -0700
Thread-Topic: More LLIDL questions
Thread-Index: AcmSCQdElIdDvWmrRs66TZORxodjTQ==
Message-ID: <62BFE5680C037E4DA0B0A08946C0933D501FE18E@rrsmsx506.amr.corp.intel.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-cr-puzzleid: {A243B84A-EDA7-4615-8530-418CB49650A5}
x-cr-hashedpuzzle: AFZp ATxL Acfu Af0B A2uo Ef/h E0LG F8rT GiWy GluN HS0v HXq4 JXtr Jhju KdmR Kifs; 1; bQBtAG8AeABAAGkAZQB0AGYALgBvAHIAZwA=; Sosha1_v1; 7; {A243B84A-EDA7-4615-8530-418CB49650A5}; agBvAGgAbgAuAGgAdQByAGwAaQBtAGEAbgBAAGkAbgB0AGUAbAAuAGMAbwBtAA==; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 20:39:43 GMT; TQBvAHIAZQAgAEwATABJAEQATAAgAHEAdQBlAHMAdABpAG8AbgBzAA==
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [mmox] More LLIDL questions
X-BeenThere: mmox@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Massively Multi-participant Online Games and Applications <mmox.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmox>, <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmox>
List-Post: <mailto:mmox@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmox>, <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 20:40:01 -0000
; An LLSD value containing { member1 : true, member2 : true } comes in. Is member3 a string or an int? &a = { member1 : true, member2 : false, member3 : string } &a = { member1 : false, member2 : true, member3 : int } ; How is a parser supposed to handle this? &b = { $ : &b } ; Or this? &c = { $ : &d } &d = { $ : &c } ; The first variant has the type uri. The second variant has the type string? &e = uri &e = "http://www.google.com/" ; Forward-slash seems like an odd addition to 0-9+A-Z. Why this character? &f/ = "hello slash" John
- [mmox] More LLIDL questions Hurliman, John
- Re: [mmox] More LLIDL questions Mark Lentczner
- Re: [mmox] More LLIDL questions Hurliman, John
- [mmox] LLSD Charles Krinke
- Re: [mmox] LLSD Meadhbh Hamrick (Infinity)
- Re: [mmox] More LLIDL questions Meadhbh Hamrick (Infinity)
- Re: [mmox] LLSD Charles Krinke
- Re: [mmox] LLSD Meadhbh Hamrick (Infinity)
- Re: [mmox] More LLIDL questions Hurliman, John
- Re: [mmox] LLSD Charles Krinke
- Re: [mmox] LLSD Jesrad
- Re: [mmox] LLSD Charles Krinke
- Re: [mmox] More LLIDL questions Mark Lentczner
- Re: [mmox] LLSD Meadhbh Hamrick (Infinity)
- [mmox] LLSD and content schema Jon Watte
- Re: [mmox] LLSD and content schema Morgaine
- Re: [mmox] LLSD and content schema Meadhbh Hamrick (Infinity)
- Re: [mmox] LLSD and content schema Jon Watte
- Re: [mmox] LLSD and content schema Lisa Dusseault
- Re: [mmox] LLSD and content schema Jon Watte