[mmox] Agree to disagree?
Catherine Pfeffer <cathypfeffer@gmail.com> Thu, 26 February 2009 10:13 UTC
Return-Path: <cathypfeffer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mmox@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmox@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07D613A688C for <mmox@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 02:13:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.369
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.369 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.229, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cjyQqJVix5ec for <mmox@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 02:13:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com (fk-out-0910.google.com [209.85.128.186]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 028B928C0F7 for <mmox@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 02:13:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id f33so235079fkf.5 for <mmox@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 02:14:07 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=lj82yBOlv3esbfGrBOUSIoagVnKs9tm96g4+y07k1UQ=; b=wrvSF7qMu8l6+d9o9FcudWKtX/SujJchOXPz35RBvvNbszDRmgHJoOPGuilP/OdPKw rOgilTyKp6Wua2wZHCKu501BxBKIyhRjtdGbQe1vwc5BwuBfF6NuPEVs6/C4+ufyRHfv nCP7r32KF6N3m0+ZJZNcuiGqd8cmrRMJFmraM=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=rnlmPjaCaeO4gipvkv7H0gSov1MhikpiUR8WhYn3Df0qQrCcpx6thCrWxXF1hHXh3w SbsiM1fTT031OB/lP/BTnWQftP4ZshmBIISBME6Y9KC34ivpxssPCtIJ2yfjuy/ogs0r TUv7RdwOi1ErhP5tYGL+PoiyeOIV1yCOpiEXE=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.181.222.5 with SMTP id z5mr391078bkq.170.1235643247079; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 02:14:07 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:14:07 +0100
Message-ID: <ebe4d1860902260214i2b4c1814ta76ddd55f9c5d0fa@mail.gmail.com>
From: Catherine Pfeffer <cathypfeffer@gmail.com>
To: mmox@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001636c5a81ccfb1070463cf9c2a"
Subject: [mmox] Agree to disagree?
X-BeenThere: mmox@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Massively Multi-participant Online Games and Applications <mmox.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmox>, <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmox>
List-Post: <mailto:mmox@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmox>, <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 10:13:48 -0000
Infinity wrote: > to paraphrase... we think the "XML way" does not buy us anything. we > respect that other people might have a different preference or set of > requirements related to XML. but you have to respect that we're not > going to abandon a key portion of what makes our architecture > resilient in the face of version slew. so why not just agree to > disagree about it, allow virtual world deployers make up their own > minds about which presentation tier to adopt. Because exchange standards are about agreeing on a common language. -- Cathy
- [mmox] Agree to disagree? Catherine Pfeffer