[mmox] LLSD => XML way
Catherine Pfeffer <cathypfeffer@gmail.com> Thu, 26 February 2009 10:22 UTC
Return-Path: <cathypfeffer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mmox@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmox@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E64BB3A6A32 for <mmox@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 02:22:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.384
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.384 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.214, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OpEQ-TmXj3y3 for <mmox@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 02:22:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-fx0-f176.google.com (mail-fx0-f176.google.com [209.85.220.176]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE2C43A68AF for <mmox@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 02:22:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: by fxm24 with SMTP id 24so426826fxm.37 for <mmox@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 02:23:17 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=sPYtgYj5VUIfPcTiYJF5ZSdjnaB8L4dm7/mm+EpAMvw=; b=D7M+D055f7fiZTsJv6MaMjgLJqGxeEgS+VgwSfh7XJDFcsfgADwy2foAw+zzD0h24l XDsbv/m273ovB0m9uyYd+gtBwo/LN4Z4VYCHSCtubXJEhgZAwIeeLXXh6+OlgGu82ewn FzKWq6iPy345gqjFKms56xZRiUd/6cdkBjC/A=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=mPmN6tUY+cUrrlgWmAzFqb8QYdsZ0JoWA/YJ+W0/aJ8474xmtjbXTHFA/3w39QdZWb lH0etGLiun/lUOASKzqP/0O8QlO9abAoYoWXY2PZsWCSoLMFC4OpUG3+OqejJGlfFsSl u23CwOQjVyp4aMC58TXZwoou2q3/EOdc3lN0Q=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.181.199.6 with SMTP id b6mr399752bkq.137.1235643796929; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 02:23:16 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:23:16 +0100
Message-ID: <ebe4d1860902260223y4f6d7cbcn17c3316d19275c96@mail.gmail.com>
From: Catherine Pfeffer <cathypfeffer@gmail.com>
To: mmox@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001636c5a26795be270463cfbd18"
Subject: [mmox] LLSD => XML way
X-BeenThere: mmox@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Massively Multi-participant Online Games and Applications <mmox.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmox>, <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmox>
List-Post: <mailto:mmox@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmox>, <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 10:22:58 -0000
Infinity wrote: > I would also argue that if we could develop a mechanical scheme to > convert between LLIDL and "the XML way" XML DTD, we could interoperate > with such systems will less ambiguity. Very true. But as this represents some work, and as I have a company to run IRL, I would say that, before jumping into that technical solution, there should be consensus here that we really need three serializations to make virtual worlds interoperable. Who on this list, besides the 700 kilograms gorilla (Linden Lab, their own words IIRC ;-) ), has a strong desire and an use case for non-binary formats? -- Cathy
- [mmox] LLSD => XML way Catherine Pfeffer