[mmox] Use cases?
Jon Watte <jwatte@gmail.com> Fri, 27 February 2009 00:40 UTC
Return-Path: <jwatte@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mmox@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmox@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9D193A6A26 for <mmox@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 16:40:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.523
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.523 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.076, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LBpj8kvRYTh0 for <mmox@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 16:40:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from yx-out-2324.google.com (yx-out-2324.google.com [74.125.44.29]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F086E3A69B1 for <mmox@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 16:40:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: by yx-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 8so1039333yxm.49 for <mmox@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 16:41:18 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=D2bPja8HhpFrJ1845VkhZBhPsECkSZpzYwjETHInDfk=; b=t0Bubnyx+V2H4QRAZLqureqjDsDsZ0xIq669ofkljuXbQnlI4clKKaoKPuFJIx9Opl /pCKkU35HZsO15HdUlOpewVuS0Fbbrnk+bxKoVp+hmTvs0eN3+kql0/bEiIfutOyeN1W 8bY0F8IjawXWNA3sRA+gZL+Dv202MIFGnQeYs=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=wEGK6FkkPlO5ixKzoGGr5IHrvHXVAoyYWXzcOG5fNVhzqcTC25wY2LtQKtZ7XDYms/ t16yFjn7e1Bg1MJn5SgH6g0gEskgmExv3fRB54Sg9ausxTxRLowRHQleLx6cJi7cWFhT 1JXrmg6Psw+nKm6QnOIf9ow01A0PEwicjvGVs=
Received: by 10.100.240.17 with SMTP id n17mr972702anh.48.1235695277495; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 16:41:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?192.168.168.114? (smtp.forterrainc.com [208.64.184.34]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b7sm6195392ana.59.2009.02.26.16.41.16 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 26 Feb 2009 16:41:16 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <49A736AA.2020205@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 16:41:14 -0800
From: Jon Watte <jwatte@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "mmox@ietf.org" <mmox@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [mmox] Use cases?
X-BeenThere: mmox@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Massively Multi-participant Online Games and Applications <mmox.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmox>, <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmox>
List-Post: <mailto:mmox@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmox>, <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 00:40:58 -0000
I posted five use cases that I think cover a fair range of virtual world interoperability. I've gotten several nice replies in the mail, but on the list they seem to have soared like a lead balloon, as opposed to all talk about XML vs binary vs IP property rights. Surely, agreeing on requirements (such as use cases) is actually more important than discussing implementation details that we don't even know will apply yet? Any opinions, for or against, regarding these use cases? Silent assent? http://www.interopworld.org/mmox-use-cases Sincerely, jw
- Re: [mmox] Use cases? Jon Watte
- [mmox] Use cases? Jon Watte
- Re: [mmox] Use cases? Meadhbh Hamrick (Infinity)
- Re: [mmox] Use cases? Mystical Demina
- Re: [mmox] Use cases? Mystical Demina
- Re: [mmox] Use cases? Jesrad
- Re: [mmox] Use cases? Jon Watte