IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mmox] Open Grid Protocol -- Maybe need a redifinition for MMOX scope ?

Jon Watte <jwatte@gmail.com> Thu, 26 February 2009 23:28 UTC

Return-Path: <jwatte@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mmox@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmox@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FB143A6ACD for <mmox@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:28:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.52
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.52 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.079, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lXfbeQeJSMBe for <mmox@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:28:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from yx-out-2324.google.com (yx-out-2324.google.com [74.125.44.30]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 690EE3A6AB9 for <mmox@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:28:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: by yx-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 8so1002434yxm.49 for <mmox@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:29:06 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=O7b3V0N1X/nhOdoMdmtMLpF7ei1sGjhUWx+CUdUfcfg=; b=d5pB7fWa6GLDLgf2zNkietELCDcsc6cwb+ASYj4PjYrn1gSN4MnZOdHuEfirGd7d3r w2MEP4K/NXLZAaXCEsQtsd8OGSGr7D6c4915n/WnlqZg6qs4tjDUgdCHBiue+VTuhYP5 ClUIySwZNhmso660Ew1I5szMloZ3QRZ9oNN5I=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=BiaxWKj+z1saNPLHyyS3Sl1C44TEXvQQNCSa4o4ree0iXz5szdtVWqdwQYfndfOoS9 6G2owKuhmBac7dQr0GacjX1g3iOYYmBNyRnjazRjptpn29NKoPUjQCIhCU0jlwpBiRUI 8sj+o4IAYg5XiNC41Xrwj6gFMydJaoKE2daAg=
Received: by 10.100.166.10 with SMTP id o10mr897832ane.96.1235690946053; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:29:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?192.168.168.114? (smtp.forterrainc.com [208.64.184.34]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d35sm7062923and.38.2009.02.26.15.29.04 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:29:05 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <49A725BF.3040103@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:29:03 -0800
From: Jon Watte <jwatte@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Kajikawa Jeremy <belxjander@gmail.com>
References: <228D0A40-F63F-4564-9200-0FF543902FD4@lindenlab.com> <e0b04bba0902261358s74e88140y12a411068be9e4ad@mail.gmail.com> <7D208FA9-3C91-422F-B24F-F1B0B85908B9@lindenlab.com> <1235688708.4026.47.camel@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <1235688708.4026.47.camel@localhost>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "mmox@ietf.org" <mmox@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mmox] Open Grid Protocol -- Maybe need a redifinition for MMOX scope ?
X-BeenThere: mmox@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Massively Multi-participant Online Games and Applications <mmox.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmox>, <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmox>
List-Post: <mailto:mmox@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmox>, <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 23:28:45 -0000

Kajikawa Jeremy wrote:
> There is two "global" methods used for accessing modules of the OGP
> library
>
>   OpenModule()  Load and call an Init Function for the Module named
>   CloseModule()  call an Exit() function also allowing the module to be
> free'd
>
>   

A protocol and a library are two totally different things. The charter 
of this group is to define a wire protocol, not an API or a library. Do 
you think you can re-phrase your suggestion as a change in protocol, 
rather than change in API?



Sincerely,

jw

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email