IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MMUSIC] unified plan glareless atomicity improvement

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Wed, 31 July 2013 13:45 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B44211E817D for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 06:45:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.457
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.457 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.143, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iLY0vfUhOMNr for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 06:45:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-we0-x235.google.com (mail-we0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::235]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64F8811E8178 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 06:45:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-we0-f181.google.com with SMTP id p58so600173wes.26 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 06:45:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=QEKamRQ/OMJ8k23IkRLcHQ0oun2SV0YzQV4OMePbkV0=; b=qkN6Lbc7VOABBX4+7VSzz8CtvCm4PB8XuSnPXiuP/s9h49tV2352Of75EPHMgvhSPh rvGNjOuK0m781U5XE+CCioG7UUvau7YXTYrQLLAU3jr+9EbUTsmE2/HdYcJUAIS9wJRM X0N/U3b8zVqZw8Hq4Gwp0HPBEQLrNwAYX3Xu8xo7N/RSDTbDbRDulZw2SGDIPcakTvs4 2mVApiRXhvAEjeZ6PuGyg+MhM/aYIF32a+umkc7RHXukKqq4shrI7/exiwUXeBx36OTe i+qA8ws/LQHZbazWpnyln5vhVlEQIp+bCLvFjmlJwpc0odD3X3p7ZKx5KWCcWaJ9fmI8 DExw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.73.68 with SMTP id j4mr4426150wiv.10.1375278327451; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 06:45:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.60.46 with HTTP; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 06:45:27 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAMRcRGQ9GOKEah65w5XV5YjHWC_Bjsg1_K2V_jm15=MyZA19Xw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABkgnnWzq--ej3BPt8jy4hZNmRrqf7Fvff2sgPjThSRRa9UBpQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAMRcRGQ9GOKEah65w5XV5YjHWC_Bjsg1_K2V_jm15=MyZA19Xw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 15:45:27 +0200
Message-ID: <CABkgnnUoP==5OkRjoBn0+M1a-S3D4AzW-_yWBO2MBcFmW_dc6w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Suhas Nandakumar <suhasietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Cc: "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] unified plan glareless atomicity improvement
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 13:45:29 -0000

On 31 July 2013 15:34, Suhas Nandakumar <suhasietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am not sure if this proposal answer this topic .. I had a similar proposal
> with uni-directional handling w.r.t glare ...
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-nandakumar-rtcweb-glare-handling-00.txt

I think that in many respects, the unified approach to glare handling
is similar to your glare draft.  However, I believe that the unified
plan approach doesn't mandate the crazy m-line reordering shenanigans
you propose there :)  Any unified plan implementation would no longer
require a strictly ordered set of m-lines.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email