IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MMUSIC] unified plan glareless atomicity improvement

Suhas Nandakumar <suhasietf@gmail.com> Wed, 31 July 2013 13:46 UTC

Return-Path: <suhasietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5884521F9B11 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 06:46:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.355
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.355 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.244, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G23j6dLECYxV for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 06:46:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-we0-x22a.google.com (mail-we0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22a]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1CF821F9F5C for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 06:46:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-we0-f170.google.com with SMTP id w60so635003wes.15 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 06:46:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=SqZYtDk+zjdGrLxon5KYpzW/P/9ZOEug9JkJX2fL0tg=; b=LnA42Cz9LV+z95NjzINn79eDC8U88BsNZRNOiYvbPnCBolb1g4lqiz00frEESexcNn KlEbQuM7b/HDS8GXPLfAI/lTbPLMrSUVSfQbPpcnwnyIOXKVfOVk4GwuPbX6c+GSA4VM h+gsERCPfeymKFe/qcXqJpzi20m/j/zNrbSiAsRxJL8cjOYybENhQF0VTg3HLSiuGP+V NbVf2Wvaq2DLxCzUkA7GuMBFcLYHE2nRqB0gsOUTYfRAoD4Rl5AhQScSfFLRNOCmKLLR z43IKK1tLBNSBG6Ko9SBLgQHp+3gRBBd4gIpyb1Xyn9d1KHfkUCMfmISByXiCWdKEnkF qRCg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.81.39 with SMTP id w7mr28189197wjx.51.1375278401758; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 06:46:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.9.9 with HTTP; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 06:46:41 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnUoP==5OkRjoBn0+M1a-S3D4AzW-_yWBO2MBcFmW_dc6w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABkgnnWzq--ej3BPt8jy4hZNmRrqf7Fvff2sgPjThSRRa9UBpQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAMRcRGQ9GOKEah65w5XV5YjHWC_Bjsg1_K2V_jm15=MyZA19Xw@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnUoP==5OkRjoBn0+M1a-S3D4AzW-_yWBO2MBcFmW_dc6w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 15:46:41 +0200
Message-ID: <CAMRcRGTDf0T61qxJ9G1et7CGk-SVmr8HrLSss25LGxeUtL8t8A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Suhas Nandakumar <suhasietf@gmail.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7bb70e129aabc404e2cef4ed"
Cc: "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] unified plan glareless atomicity improvement
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 13:46:44 -0000

100% Agreed on the martial arts issue. :-)

Cheers
Suhas

On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>wrote:

> On 31 July 2013 15:34, Suhas Nandakumar <suhasietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I am not sure if this proposal answer this topic .. I had a similar
> proposal
> > with uni-directional handling w.r.t glare ...
> >
> > http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-nandakumar-rtcweb-glare-handling-00.txt
>
> I think that in many respects, the unified approach to glare handling
> is similar to your glare draft.  However, I believe that the unified
> plan approach doesn't mandate the crazy m-line reordering shenanigans
> you propose there :)  Any unified plan implementation would no longer
> require a strictly ordered set of m-lines.
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email