Re: [MMUSIC] Do we really need TCP/DTLS/SCTP proto field?

Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> Mon, 20 February 2017 00:20 UTC

Return-Path: <ibc@aliax.net>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BF1A1295EE for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Feb 2017 16:20:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=aliax-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MOnl2KwyhEgc for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Feb 2017 16:20:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x235.google.com (mail-wm0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85FEA1295B4 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 Feb 2017 16:20:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm0-x235.google.com with SMTP id v186so64000081wmd.0 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 Feb 2017 16:20:06 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=aliax-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=77sQCE4MFzOmFQMBPEwxnXModNkxfQWdXOGspL5+o3c=; b=Gm1ARu3ttg0P1aoxVjCISNJSb2PgOCV41D62KK5+3Rgu76Qqa2RIBDwdDlthLul9+b A/v435kgZL9HBmqAg2uTP2y6ZTdPiQ49nNbDsrtL0bdKpQkXDe1xOVjRJLR0lUs+hOsU 0rluecdoV4tYTvggH+oamQCO+XxgOZ/6W9Eq99aWbWBnKwhvFChB0jgML9xWcznzAuQE puxkM7x+WQjDo/ByQPjNu2pwN+2gsaEwwLKC4apyVgZceGsCKEPd250J1aZ5QNkT8pD1 OmrxQFeIy98Ybfx3rJvU7iRSEBlVQXPQxhVTZvADl2J5NLGCxD0IIfcCj0XcNBiQTWd8 FplA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=77sQCE4MFzOmFQMBPEwxnXModNkxfQWdXOGspL5+o3c=; b=KPDnkEIZW7eUPT3MNzfW73BzkLT577n9Aw+WWJ0CJVfZ46TdsfZSYy4n+Dxko1cqSB 3l4HvVGJvUoHbzHHmXyPOYTQ2Zw/UMCyEUsQq/ENDWnE6b/tdAncB4DAYLaCDL3EkLG2 7iYrctErcRLIPbK21252vGNNIuQ1bNrPJ5i99G/FYO9eAe+bVdD1Pxaf/e8JSpMvj697 6HwNfSz77vXRpJtCQMDiTq1vq5W8CNeA7a7xuXMfKou+IIBj8Z19eMHusymdpPFLsZu0 0/HBTzdXdVn/lpkOwl9tM43dkLoRRtjw8hhaYbZfvLKn688bIGZHtJtcSGE28/iHpRhQ +S1A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39m1aX/w/lBuf4K8mYEeUvj365wQ+H+yH7rVufIDW5mvRv2zftRTPVP1pgHcPnUOH+hMabgp2yMdQk/1eQ==
X-Received: by 10.28.97.2 with SMTP id v2mr16387343wmb.3.1487550004900; Sun, 19 Feb 2017 16:20:04 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.80.182.85 with HTTP; Sun, 19 Feb 2017 16:19:44 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBOSt9B43BbNFw29fLOOwvvTTR18eK_ELmF5-carG=ouuA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABcZeBOK0T5WbMLi=AS3WOAjDt_D8e8JSTp2czSYdhHv8Xcgtw@mail.gmail.com> <118E7032-775C-46D6-A76A-6DB6EA515528@nostrum.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B4C004589@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CAD5OKxt4mBZ=RaLheOuZCp2TZuhiNZ1E9a86NL8TQ1U2kGsZeQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBOSt9B43BbNFw29fLOOwvvTTR18eK_ELmF5-carG=ouuA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 01:19:44 +0100
Message-ID: <CALiegfnV97hgRHaZrV_5dFf1r5186TtDko6tCNZ3TtDCx++hMA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/0xrZiZqUaB0R-0vuYmUIuB3PKPk>
Cc: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>, mmusic WG <mmusic@ietf.org>, Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] Do we really need TCP/DTLS/SCTP proto field?
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 00:20:09 -0000

2017-02-16 18:38 GMT+01:00 Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>:
> I also think the re-INVITE is unnecessary.

Such a re-INVITE is like "hey, we have agreed on a candidate pair by
using ICE procedures and, hence, now I send you a message confirming
it to you, which is totally useless because you already know that".


-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc@aliax.net>