IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MMUSIC] Do we really need TCP/DTLS/SCTP proto field?

Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Sat, 18 February 2017 09:32 UTC

Return-Path: <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05DF31294D3 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 18 Feb 2017 01:32:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.221
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.221 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yP_rPJzR3QTm for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 18 Feb 2017 01:32:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sessmg22.ericsson.net (sessmg22.ericsson.net [193.180.251.58]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C486512941D for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Sat, 18 Feb 2017 01:32:31 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb3a-f72d4980000021e0-f9-58a814ad20e8
Received: from ESESSHC022.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.183.84]) by (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 6B.6E.08672.DA418A85; Sat, 18 Feb 2017 10:32:29 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ESESSMB209.ericsson.se ([169.254.9.76]) by ESESSHC022.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.84]) with mapi id 14.03.0319.002; Sat, 18 Feb 2017 10:31:48 +0100
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>, Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
Thread-Topic: [MMUSIC] Do we really need TCP/DTLS/SCTP proto field?
Thread-Index: AQHSiGuZ0ghkIgIFz0iRXtxKyN1pOqFrt7kAgAAhoiD///XmgIAABf+AgAARKfD///H8AIAAEY/QgAGCcoCAAAjKgIABDT9w
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2017 09:31:47 +0000
Message-ID: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B4C00762F@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
References: <CABcZeBOK0T5WbMLi=AS3WOAjDt_D8e8JSTp2czSYdhHv8Xcgtw@mail.gmail.com> <118E7032-775C-46D6-A76A-6DB6EA515528@nostrum.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B4C004589@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CAD5OKxt4mBZ=RaLheOuZCp2TZuhiNZ1E9a86NL8TQ1U2kGsZeQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBOSt9B43BbNFw29fLOOwvvTTR18eK_ELmF5-carG=ouuA@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B4C00464B@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CAD5OKxvZ7xwQ6eXEFy0p-SPezaVM2XK=K5rThv1w+1Xc511FkA@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B4C0046CD@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <18C350AD-9C5B-4723-B934-4E27DD86FB6B@nostrum.com> <CAD5OKxt_HNOTEWN_62u_7JoR=pyUW6H6v-oBTcimoOJz36LbRg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAD5OKxt_HNOTEWN_62u_7JoR=pyUW6H6v-oBTcimoOJz36LbRg@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.150]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFmpkkeLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42KZGbE9RHetyIoIg5mtVhbzO0+zW0xd/pjF YsaFqcwOzB5Llvxk8pi18wmLx60pBQHMUVw2Kak5mWWpRfp2CVwZHbdzC6ZxVax79pKlgfEL ZxcjJ4eEgInEjA1LWUFsIYF1jBInNvt3MXIB2YsZJSYtvsLYxcjBwSZgIdH9TxukRkTAVaLr +3RGEJtZQF7iwpI1TCC2sICTxJv3V1khapwlzt1oYoSw8yRmzl4OVsMioCpxecd/FhCbV8BX YtqbuywQuxaxSpzbNp0ZZBenQKDEnA/xIDWMAmIS309BzGcWEJe49WQ+E8TNAhJL9pxnhrBF JV4+/scKYStJrNh+CexkZgFNifW79CFaFSWmdD9kh1grKHFy5hOWCYyis5BMnYXQMQtJxywk HQsYWVYxihanFhfnphsZ6aUWZSYXF+fn6eWllmxiBEbMwS2/rXYwHnzueIhRgINRiYf3A//y CCHWxLLiytxDjBIczEoivBMEVkQI8aYkVlalFuXHF5XmpBYfYpTmYFES5zVbeT9cSCA9sSQ1 OzW1ILUIJsvEwSnVwJhw9pfxKs8jZRuLwn23/AkKCrh672Wwv6bPGf5vi/KWaze9vyLVKSLR mtclEbLV+cEMz0WcU24n3mtPtpvOY/9Sq3nzo/o3EsuavAuuzI0NOiFyKa2yfiofh/mTrIKm 56W1EkLhz4WWW63XnWvh8VHe54lEstHqHwV7hZ5P9i3pMV2UZJJ5T4mlOCPRUIu5qDgRALUk BUKUAgAA
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/Jb2uu7g9R5JaPsP14m4f1D7JP_c>
Cc: mmusic WG <mmusic@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] Do we really need TCP/DTLS/SCTP proto field?
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2017 09:32:33 -0000

Hi,

>>To be clear, are you talking about clarifying text in _this_ draft, or elsewhere?
>
>Christer is talking about section 12.2 of the draft-ietf-mmusic-sctp-sdp. As the language stands right 
>now, it is not incorrect, but is slightly confusing, since it is talking about default candidates for all ICE 
>related offer/answer exchanges.  After ICE nomination process is completed, there is only one candidate 
>left, so there is no default. In session descriptions that describe the session after ICE nomination is complete
>only one candidate is present, so there is typically no confusion about what goes into the m= line, but this is 
>not spelled out in the draft. I will submit the PR and Christer can merge and resubmit the draft when he is back.

Thanks!

Also note that this is something that shall be clear in draft-ice-sip-sdp, because it's not SCTP-SDP specific. But, that's a separate issue.

Regards,

Christer

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email